Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com>
To: "Michael Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	"cerowrt-devel" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] risc-v 2 ethernet port router
Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 18:22:33 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1683498153.625631572@apps.rackspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29691.1683477385@localhost>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1785 bytes --]


Celerons and Atoms have been doing just fine with fq_codel on 1 GigE. However, the prices for 2 port boxes seems to be about $200 with RAM and enough flash to boot LInux.
 
I personally think the time has come to start using 2.5 GigE on the typical 2 port home routers, and avoid USB, as it just makes support harder - use PCIe.
 
But I'm a special case, my home lab and all of my home is 10 GigE backbone, with 2.5 GigE to the wireless APs. This calendar year, I'm moving to either 25 or 40 GigE on the backbone and in the lab, but I haven't picked the final setup. Partly it depends on what I can get from my external ISP for a reasonable price - hopefully 2 Gig or better will come here, we have many competitors (3 cable providers and various small business fixed wireless).
 
I'm wondering about how fq_codel will handle these higher speeds on inexpensive computers.
 
David
 
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 12:36pm, "Michael Richardson via Cerowrt-devel" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net> said:



> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> 
> Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, I do not know if it is fq_codel capable. A lot of folk have been
> > missing on adding in BQL support of late, and as to whether it has the
> 
> I mean... at $119, if it can do fq_codel, then the price is totally
> acceptable :-)
> 
> > horsepower to do SQM at these rates is undetermined - I have generally
> > felt gobs of cache were required to do soft rate shaping.
> 
> > Secondly, you can always add a 3rd ethernet port via usb nowadays.
> 
> Yes, it's just less elegant if you want to have 5-6 of them in a lab.
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3229 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2023-05-07 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-06 13:59 Dave Taht
2023-05-07 16:09 ` Michael Richardson
2023-05-07 16:27   ` Dave Taht
2023-05-07 16:36     ` Michael Richardson
2023-05-07 22:22       ` David P. Reed [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1683498153.625631572@apps.rackspace.com \
    --to=dpreed@deepplum.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=mcr@sandelman.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox