From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-x22b.google.com (mail-ea0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA8221F170; Thu, 2 May 2013 22:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ea0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b10so596735eae.16 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:58:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=YyM1ZXWguR7Y41YYS1OcjNybPfrdg3XcjsJGSQ7JauI=; b=0iKkwkOQXThOS0f1ma7T1Z2oGqtRMoiePDc6TKDKs+ddfMEyib9kW/U0bZdHifB7Es DMYRC6IBYCh/wUh1Zuf6E3LolJ9a/VT1KuBl5BKkhxsZJvMrl369quU42I15wZCaggGj BYOozxfHfPvvtYiUtoaXKsU8DLVs+HammLxAbcGT57yAFEB58jQzlfFAfyCLbzEbrkyp K26kDvB8yPm/l4/06SosyBT8d3CJd0MKqhuaSmY17NeBntiaSOhpqOUH2WctaavUBBWX J5+NXd7Zwb41R6MoMEOv8hA36Kvl6H5NKNpkgMChEkXNMj6RIu9T9ZWq1y/MGoBz57AG KTMQ== X-Received: by 10.14.194.70 with SMTP id l46mr27387171een.28.1367560707591; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (xdsl-83-150-84-172.nebulazone.fi. [83.150.84.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm13653549eez.10.2013.05.02.22.58.25 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 22:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 08:58:24 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <16BAF29C-8405-40D4-9B03-EEA4E8033112@gmail.com> References: To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: bloat-devel , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] optimizing for very small bandwidths with fq_codel better? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 05:58:30 -0000 On 3 May, 2013, at 1:07 am, Dave Taht wrote: > 1) I think there's a bug in either the kernel or tc or me on tos = matching, So this works: tc filter add dev eth2 parent a: protocol ip prio 8 u32 match ip tos = 0x2e fc flowid a:b But this doesn't: tc filter add dev eth2 parent a: protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip tos = 0x08 0xfc flowid a:b I notice, near the end, that one has fc and the other has 0xfc. - Jonathan Morton