From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5145E201B8F for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EED92003C; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 19:23:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id EF70163ABA; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 18:03:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD2863AA2; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 18:03:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: References: <30456.1396032043@sandelman.ca> <30177.1396127292@sandelman.ca> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: wndr3800 replacement X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:03:38 -0000 Dave Taht wrote: >> Dave Taht wrote: >> that is just fine. I don't >> expect 24-ports of GbE. >> (I was expecting that cisco switch to do >> that... sadly no lost packets >> on a $100 unmanaged FE switch...) >> >> > I started looking at the edgerouter LTE and related boxes again. > >> Does anyone else have one? >> >> I have ordered the 5-port POE one. > Does that support gigabit POE? Unclear... web site says: 10/100/1000 Ethernet ports that support 24V or 48V PoE output with software-selectable voltage control* >> My understanding is that it runs Vyatta. I would suspect that given >> that the > It is running an older version of vyatta, yes. okay. >> edgerouter is MIPS, and has "special hardware", that VyOS might not >> have the > Not sure what the offloads buy you, except added latency. They are > easily disabled for testing various qdiscs... (can't remember the > command offhand) >> right support for that hardware. I'm going to talk to Ubiquity if I >> can on Monday. It might not make sense to run *Wrt on this device, >> not sure. > There is a pretty modern looking up-to-date build of openwrt for the > edgerouter, using 3.10, and so on. I am told however, that there are > some problems with the toolchain, which show up when you try to use > iptables. Haven't tried it myself (my edgerouter is 60km away), and > don't know how to flash openwrt onto it in the first place. okay. > the current edgerouter firmware (v.1.4.1) is based on 3.4.23, and has > all the bugs in the 3.4 series. > I backported fq_codel and the latest flow hashing stuff to that > version; patch 0013 is a little problematic as yet: why did you backport, rather than move the kernel forward? Are there custom pieces in 3.4 which need to be forward ported? > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/edgerouter-fq_codel-patches/ -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [