From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Received: from order.stressinduktion.org (order.stressinduktion.org
	[87.106.68.36])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "order.stressinduktion.org",
	Issuer "order.stressinduktion.org" (not verified))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D657201A98
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by order.stressinduktion.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 561471A0C2CE; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 00:08:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 00:08:38 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
Message-ID: <20130816220838.GA16508@order.stressinduktion.org>
References: <CAA93jw6=KM5+JFhqjQ7j2WOqoeqd88fShtx-OEO=E3auEAixwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<E3A60B17-3140-4791-8746-B54406E28EC8@inf-net.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E3A60B17-3140-4791-8746-B54406E28EC8@inf-net.nl>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:09:28 -0700
Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>,
	Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] IPv6 address assignment and naming
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:08:42 -0000

Hello all!

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:21:03PM +0200, Teco Boot wrote:
> The IPv6 subtrees in on its way :-). After 3.11 we can ask for backports.

It is already in davem's stable queue and should be integrated in the next stable
kernels. If openwrt picks them up, it should show up there, too.

> > While most of the ipv6 stuff in openwrt is going increasingly well, AND we just got working multi-prefix routing fixed in the linux kernel (not sure if the IPV6_subtrees spatches are committed or backported yet), there are still integration hassles with ipv6 going on. (I expect integration hassles for years, actually - dealing with the pure dynamic assignments the isps are demanding is nearly impossible)

May I ask if those fixes for multi-prefix routing made it upstream? Btw. I
am more then willing to have a look at ipv6 kernel problems and maybe
fix them. ;)

Thanks a lot,

  Hannes