From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] some kernel updates
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:10:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130827131023.263ad4ad@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7p67TaW6LrfcTu1_0yT6Vsb3H=Fb_a5sfVzH6VXAJ40w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:29:25 -0700
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have a date/kernel version on when linklayer overhead
> compensation stopped working?
ADSL/ATM linklayer shaping were broken in kernel release from 3.8 to
3.10 by commit 56b765b79 ("htb: improved accuracy at high rates") in
v3.8-rc1~139^2~455.
> There was a bug even prior to 3.8 that looked bad.
Eric Dumazet also found a general "linklayer atm" regression
(dating way-back), which could cause rate-tables to get wrongly shared
between the same rates with-and-without linklayer atm settings.
Addressed/fixed in (3.10-rc6:):
- commit 40edeff6e1c (net_sched: qdisc_get_rtab() must check data[] array)
When configuring two completely equal rates, the kernel detects that
these two equal rates can share the same rate-table. But the kernel
didn't check if the rate-table data had been modified, which is done
in the linklayer atm case.
In practice, this often isn't a problem, as overhead parameter is
usually combined with the linklayer parameter.
See my description here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/62528
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 18:42 Dave Taht
[not found] ` <56B261F1-2277-457C-9A38-FAB89818288F@gmx.de>
[not found] ` <CAA93jw6ku0OOXzNcAUtK4UL5uc7R2zVAOKo1+Fwzmr7gCH1pzA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <2148E2EF-A119-4499-BAC1-7E647C53F077@gmx.de>
2013-08-23 0:52 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 5:13 ` Dave Taht
2013-08-23 7:27 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-08-23 10:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 11:16 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-08-23 12:37 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 13:02 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-23 19:49 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 15:05 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-08-23 17:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-08-23 20:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 20:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-08-24 20:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 19:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 9:16 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 19:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 19:47 ` Dave Taht
2013-08-23 19:56 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-23 20:29 ` Dave Taht
2013-08-24 20:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-24 20:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-25 9:21 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-25 10:17 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-25 13:59 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-25 14:26 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-25 14:31 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-25 17:53 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-25 17:55 ` Dave Taht
2013-08-25 18:00 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-25 18:30 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-25 18:41 ` Dave Taht
2013-08-25 19:08 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-25 19:31 ` Fred Stratton
2013-08-25 21:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-25 20:28 ` Dave Taht
2013-08-25 21:40 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-25 21:50 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-08-27 11:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2013-08-27 10:45 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-08-30 15:46 ` [Cerowrt-devel] some kernel updates + new userspace patch Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-08-27 10:42 ` [Cerowrt-devel] some kernel updates Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-08-24 23:08 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130827131023.263ad4ad@redhat.com \
--to=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox