From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6B2121F17D; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 14:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 14:23:55 -0700 From: Dave Taht To: Daniel Pocock Message-ID: <20130908212355.GB14461@lists.bufferbloat.net> References: <522CCD9E.5040706@pocock.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <522CCD9E.5040706@pocock.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Bringing asio to *WRT X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 21:23:56 -0000 On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:18:54PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I posted this contribution to OpenWRT but it has been ignored for almost > 12 months: > > https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-September/016771.html > > I've tried asio on OpenWRT and it seems to work fine, I've submitted a > patch for it. Would it be possible to bring this directly into CeroWRT? We maintain a packages repo (ceropackages-3.3) for various bits of interesting stuff. Certainly a decent stun/turn server in the webrtc world would be "interesting" It's not clear to me what else asio is - and if it is "decent enough"? In general I am allergic to c++/boost stuff in tiny embedded systems - we have only so much flash and ram to spare. What are the flash and memory impacts? Anyway, if you want to package it up I'll gladly fold it into ceropackages, and build it, where more can fiddle with it. > > Regards, > > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel