From: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy?
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:01:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131219210108.GN1582@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312191204490.26048@nftneq.ynat.uz>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:05:21PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> >David Lang <david@lang.hm> writes:
> >
> >>I believe that Linux allows having both tagged and untagged packets on
> >>the samy physical interface, so the APs could communicate on a VLAN
> >>and one could be the gateway to the rest of the network (similar type
> >>of overhead in this case to GRE tunnels in that all traffic would get
> >>routed through one system, but I think it would still be less)
> >
> >What happens to the VLAN tags if the traffic goes through a
> >non-VLAN-aware switch?
>
> non-aware switches will just pass the packets, reatining the tagging
Mostly. Some non-VLAN-aware switches will drop frames larger than
1518 bytes (including FCS). The switch needs to support up to 1522
byte frames to support the normal IP MTU of 1500 bytes plus a 4-byte
VLAN tag.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-16 19:46 Dave Taht
2013-12-16 20:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-12-16 20:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-12-16 20:48 ` Kelvin Edmison
2013-12-16 21:28 ` David Lang
2013-12-16 22:06 ` Fred Stratton
2013-12-17 17:54 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-17 18:51 ` Jim Gettys
2013-12-17 22:25 ` dpreed
2013-12-17 22:32 ` Jim Gettys
2013-12-17 23:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-12-18 1:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-18 3:04 ` David Lang
2013-12-18 5:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-18 5:49 ` David Lang
2013-12-18 14:17 ` Chuck Anderson
2013-12-18 15:19 ` dpreed
2013-12-18 16:54 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-18 18:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-12-18 19:24 ` David Lang
2013-12-18 20:07 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-18 20:14 ` David Lang
2013-12-19 9:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-12-19 14:32 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-19 20:05 ` David Lang
2013-12-19 21:01 ` Chuck Anderson [this message]
2013-12-20 0:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-20 5:18 ` dpreed
2013-12-18 14:06 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-27 23:56 ` Maciej Soltysiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131219210108.GN1582@angus.ind.WPI.EDU \
--to=cra@wpi.edu \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox