From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cra@WPI.EDU>
Received: from MAIL1.WPI.EDU (MAIL1.WPI.EDU [130.215.36.91])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663FB21F118
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:43:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MAIL1.WPI.EDU (MAIL1.WPI.EDU [130.215.36.91])
	by MAIL1.WPI.EDU (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rBP1h5aQ004917
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:43:05 -0500
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 MAIL1.WPI.EDU rBP1h5aQ004917
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wpi.edu; s=_dkim;
	t=1387935785; bh=ahKfY3SGEj6vYx6ZD1dc0IrlBZ+z5YkoLO/JqiHEl58=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type:In-Reply-To;
	b=D37Xt3XmDewyoy1oXz95pOHtwVp57coq/1jGvV2ca149bH0VSjfx6zOq6OvmuLMHB
	ZUO2QaPy1Ggcuvox4Wp85gft1BLpz9kfiYU19LTlls6Z2tGR/+TWKnQR52pVNei6t1
	Nc0iUcTqHuJz4Qi/MtQX6vCSp2+Pv+P+w7UIIofU=
Received: from SMTP.WPI.EDU (SMTP.WPI.EDU [130.215.36.186])
	by MAIL1.WPI.EDU (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rBP1h5C0004914
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:43:05 -0500
Received: from angus.ind.WPI.EDU (ANGUS.IND.WPI.EDU [130.215.130.21])
	by SMTP.WPI.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBP1h33J006492
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:43:04 -0500 (envelope-from cra@WPI.EDU)
Received: from angus.ind.WPI.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by angus.ind.WPI.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBP1h3Ns024820
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:43:03 -0500
Received: (from cra@localhost)
	by angus.ind.WPI.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id rBP1h3el024819
	for cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:43:03 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: angus.ind.WPI.EDU: cra set sender to cra@WPI.EDU
	using -f
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:43:03 -0500
From: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Message-ID: <20131225014302.GB7978@angus.ind.WPI.EDU>
Mail-Followup-To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <CAA93jw6+8R90ykDw49ryrtQ9RxMDVTgMNp=bMvYwcFPWMjUK7Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6+8R90ykDw49ryrtQ9RxMDVTgMNp=bMvYwcFPWMjUK7Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.24-8 "North Pole" development
 build released
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 01:43:06 -0000

On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 11:51:56AM -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> I expect I'll get another cero out before the new year. The biggest
> problem I see
> is that I can't get ipv6 from comcast to work. As to that being cero
> (6relayd?) or this crappy cable modem, don't know. Need to setup a
> dhcpv6 server to test it.

Did you happen to see Randy Bush's problems with Comcast IPv6 &
OpenWRT on nanog recently?  I don't know how much of this applies to
CeroWRT, but here was his solution:

http://rtechblog.psg.com/

I'm still waiting for native IPv6 support on my Comcast CMTS...until
them I'm using an HE tunnel.