From: Bill Merriam <lists@billmerriam.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR alternative for higher capacity
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 12:22:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140209122259.261147e0@giga.billmerriam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mwi18fl5.fsf@toke.dk>
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:22:30 +0100
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> So I've hit the capacity limit for the WNDR3800 for upstream
> bandwidth:
> http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/karlstad/rrul-2014-02-08T195914.021795.cerowrt_3_10_26_fresh_boot_no_sqm.png
>
> This is without sqm enabled, even. When I plug in my laptop instead, I
> get a smooth 100Mbps in both directions. So I'm now looking for
> alternatives to act as router. Any suggestions? I'd prefer dual-band,
> dual radios; similar to what the WNDR has. And has to be able to run
> OpenWRT, of course; in which case I'll try to get Cerowrt running on
> it. :)
>
> One possibility is getting something like a zbox:
> http://www.zotac.com/products/mini-pcs/zbox/product/zbox/detail/zbox-id91-1.html
>
> Or a shuttle:
> http://uk.shuttle.com/products/productsSpec?productId=1718
>
> However those might be a bit overkill. Also I can't seem to find any
> info on what wlan card they feature. Does anyone know?
>
> -Toke
The announced but not yet available Linksys WRT1900AC might meet your
needs. The press release says they are providing advance copies of the
hardware to the openwrt developers and linksys expects openwrt to ready
when the hardware is released in "Spring 2014".
http://www.linksys.com/en-us/press/releases/2014-01-06_Linksys_wrt_revolutionizes_wireless_networking
It seems cerowrt developers need early hardware also.
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-09 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-08 21:22 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-08 22:45 ` Dave Taht
2014-02-08 23:22 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-08 23:32 ` Fred Stratton
2014-02-09 17:22 ` Bill Merriam [this message]
2014-02-09 18:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-09 19:06 ` Dave Taht
2014-02-09 19:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-09 19:38 ` Fred Stratton
2014-02-09 19:43 ` Fred Stratton
2014-02-09 19:45 ` Dave Taht
2014-02-09 19:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-02-09 20:10 ` Dave Taht
2014-02-10 13:14 ` Rich Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140209122259.261147e0@giga.billmerriam.com \
--to=lists@billmerriam.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox