From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-02.primus.ca (smtp3.primus.ca [209.216.129.203]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D9D21F1EE for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [132.246.96.248] (helo=17W22EF7F) by mail-02.primus.ca with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WS7oI-00052h-08 for cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:33:14 -0400 From: "Lucas Wan" To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Sender: "Lucas Wan" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BOUNDARY16426982212051974565" Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:33:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20140324163313511.7E2A279109FD0B8A@17W22EF7F> X-Mailer: EmailTray 4.0.2.676 X-EmailTray-Signature: 1 X-EmailTray-Message-ID: 20140324163313511.7E2A279109FD0B8A@17W22EF7F X-Authenticated: lucaswan - (17W22EF7F) [132.246.96.248] Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:33:15 -0000 --BOUNDARY16426982212051974565 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I found that testmy.net seems to have insufficient bandwidth to handle the = testing. For my connection, testmy.net reports 20 Mbps, while speedtest 16= 0 Mbps. So I would not rely on what testmy.net says.=0D=0A-----Original Me= ssage-----=0D=0AFrom: Ernesto Elias =0D=0ATo: = cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net=0D=0ASubject: [Cerowrt-devel] Bette= r than speedtest.net?=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AHello everyone! I was lo= oking for a website better than speedtest.net and well I think I may have f= ound one and it is called testmy.net and what I found is that you are able = to change the server selection well to be able to determine if you have rou= ting issues or so. and also their test allows you to customize how much meg= abyte to download or upload so the test runs for over 10 seconds to better = get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I have used it and I got different = results from using speedtest.net and testmy.net and so I wanted to let ya a= bout it to see if people could use that instead of speedtest.net and though= ts? --BOUNDARY16426982212051974565 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A<= HEAD>=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A

I foun= d that testmy.net seems to have =0D=0Ainsufficient bandwidth to handle the = testing. For my connection, =0D=0Atestmy.net reports 20 Mbps, while&n= bsp;speedtest 160 Mbps. So I would not =0D=0Arely on what testmy.net = says.

=0D=0A

=0D=0A
--= ---Original Message-----
=0D=0A
From: = Ernesto Elias =0D=0A <ernestogelias@gmail.com>
=0D=0A
To: =0D=0A cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.n= et
=0D=0A
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than spee= dtest.net?
=0D=0A

=0D=0A

=0D=0A
Hello everyone! I was looking for = a website better than speedtest.ne= t and well I think I may have =0D=0A found one and it is called testmy.net and what =0D=0A I found is that you= are able to change the server selection well to be able to =0D=0A determi= ne if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows you to =0D= =0A customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs for= over 10 =0D=0A seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. = I have used it and I =0D=0A got different results from using speedtest.net and testmy.net and so I wanted to let ya about it to =0D=0A s= ee if people could use that instead of speedtest.net and thoughts? =0D=0A

= =0D=0A --BOUNDARY16426982212051974565--