From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from MAIL1.WPI.EDU (MAIL1.WPI.EDU [130.215.36.91]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED1921F2A2 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 17:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MAIL1.WPI.EDU (MAIL1.WPI.EDU [130.215.36.91]) by MAIL1.WPI.EDU (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s3602d5f002460 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:02:39 -0400 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 MAIL1.WPI.EDU s3602d5f002460 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wpi.edu; s=_dkim; t=1396742559; bh=tu+WjbrFDtY/HQx8AERdkFS4jD9/8uF8blbso4R+8Zk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=m5PfO4pgJmY0fQ0QMWPn9kgDmD9Abgka+F5p0TJNlHbpk10RKLp1OIoW3WlHqmU3W rU2IiiYW9emm27FpMGLL0/89lU4hr79qyPDP+gd5SI97dXSxss56ifsuZDBdPAnJIl vFwTkaDY80t1wXbIRx8L0tTE9AZFos+MeskbWhaM= Received: from MX3.WPI.EDU (mx3.wpi.edu [130.215.36.147]) by MAIL1.WPI.EDU (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s3602dJk002457 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:02:39 -0400 Received: from angus.ind.WPI.EDU (ANGUS.IND.WPI.EDU [130.215.130.21]) by MX3.WPI.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3602bec014073 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:02:38 -0400 (envelope-from cra@WPI.EDU) Received: from angus.ind.WPI.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angus.ind.WPI.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3602beZ015929 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:02:37 -0400 Received: (from cra@localhost) by angus.ind.WPI.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id s3602b2U015928 for cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:02:37 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: angus.ind.WPI.EDU: cra set sender to cra@WPI.EDU using -f Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:02:37 -0400 From: Chuck Anderson To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20140406000236.GM9694@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 00:02:40 -0000 Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1: First, without SQM enabled: root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) ............................................................ Download: 52.39 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 15.281 10pct: 18.302 Median: 28.502 Avg: 32.891 90pct: 56.776 Max: 74.282 ............................................................. Upload: 11.07 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 15.341 10pct: 18.669 Median: 82.480 Avg: 126.662 90pct: 248.102 Max: 278.644 And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above: root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) ............................................................ Download: 32.84 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 15.623 10pct: 16.077 Median: 17.634 Avg: 17.982 90pct: 19.653 Max: 23.272 ............................................................. Upload: 8.25 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 16.001 10pct: 17.623 Median: 19.796 Avg: 19.820 90pct: 21.716 Max: 23.228 root@cerowrt:~# On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > + openwrt merge > ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem > + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode > and wpa+psk enabled... > > Get it at: > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ > > but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... > > - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of > devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a > bunch more tomorrow. > > - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's > ntp, it seems....