From: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:08:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140406000858.GN9694@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140406000236.GM9694@angus.ind.WPI.EDU>
And IPv6 over the HE tunnel:
root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh -H netperf6.richb-hanover.com
Testing against netperf6.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction)
............................................................................
Download: 21.56 Mbps
Latency: (in msec, 77 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
Min: 14.477
10pct: 15.469
Median: 17.646
Avg: 18.906
90pct: 23.540
Max: 36.302
............................................................................
Upload: 5.85 Mbps
Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
Min: 14.589
10pct: 15.579
Median: 18.156
Avg: 18.323
90pct: 21.192
Max: 25.282
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:02:37PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1:
>
> First, without SQM enabled:
>
> root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh
> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction)
> ............................................................
> Download: 52.39 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 15.281
> 10pct: 18.302
> Median: 28.502
> Avg: 32.891
> 90pct: 56.776
> Max: 74.282
> .............................................................
> Upload: 11.07 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 15.341
> 10pct: 18.669
> Median: 82.480
> Avg: 126.662
> 90pct: 248.102
> Max: 278.644
>
> And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above:
>
> root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh
> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction)
> ............................................................
> Download: 32.84 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 15.623
> 10pct: 16.077
> Median: 17.634
> Avg: 17.982
> 90pct: 19.653
> Max: 23.272
> .............................................................
> Upload: 8.25 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 16.001
> 10pct: 17.623
> Median: 19.796
> Avg: 19.820
> 90pct: 21.716
> Max: 23.228
> root@cerowrt:~#
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> > + openwrt merge
> > ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem
> > + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode
> > and wpa+psk enabled...
> >
> > Get it at:
> >
> > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/
> >
> > but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this...
> >
> > - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of
> > devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a
> > bunch more tomorrow.
> >
> > - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's
> > ntp, it seems....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-06 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-05 20:18 Dave Taht
2014-04-06 0:02 ` Chuck Anderson
2014-04-06 0:08 ` Chuck Anderson [this message]
2014-04-06 0:57 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-06 4:48 ` Chuck Anderson
2014-04-06 21:44 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-06 0:51 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140406000858.GN9694@angus.ind.WPI.EDU \
--to=cra@wpi.edu \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox