* [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released @ 2014-04-05 20:18 Dave Taht 2014-04-06 0:02 ` Chuck Anderson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2014-04-05 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel + openwrt merge ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode and wpa+psk enabled... Get it at: http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a bunch more tomorrow. - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's ntp, it seems.... -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released 2014-04-05 20:18 [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released Dave Taht @ 2014-04-06 0:02 ` Chuck Anderson 2014-04-06 0:08 ` Chuck Anderson 2014-04-06 0:51 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Chuck Anderson @ 2014-04-06 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1: First, without SQM enabled: root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) ............................................................ Download: 52.39 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 15.281 10pct: 18.302 Median: 28.502 Avg: 32.891 90pct: 56.776 Max: 74.282 ............................................................. Upload: 11.07 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 15.341 10pct: 18.669 Median: 82.480 Avg: 126.662 90pct: 248.102 Max: 278.644 And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above: root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) ............................................................ Download: 32.84 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 15.623 10pct: 16.077 Median: 17.634 Avg: 17.982 90pct: 19.653 Max: 23.272 ............................................................. Upload: 8.25 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 16.001 10pct: 17.623 Median: 19.796 Avg: 19.820 90pct: 21.716 Max: 23.228 root@cerowrt:~# On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > + openwrt merge > ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem > + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode > and wpa+psk enabled... > > Get it at: > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ > > but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... > > - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of > devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a > bunch more tomorrow. > > - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's > ntp, it seems.... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released 2014-04-06 0:02 ` Chuck Anderson @ 2014-04-06 0:08 ` Chuck Anderson 2014-04-06 0:57 ` Dave Taht 2014-04-06 0:51 ` Dave Taht 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Chuck Anderson @ 2014-04-06 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel And IPv6 over the HE tunnel: root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh -H netperf6.richb-hanover.com Testing against netperf6.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) ............................................................................ Download: 21.56 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 77 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 14.477 10pct: 15.469 Median: 17.646 Avg: 18.906 90pct: 23.540 Max: 36.302 ............................................................................ Upload: 5.85 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 14.589 10pct: 15.579 Median: 18.156 Avg: 18.323 90pct: 21.192 Max: 25.282 On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:02:37PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1: > > First, without SQM enabled: > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > ............................................................ > Download: 52.39 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.281 > 10pct: 18.302 > Median: 28.502 > Avg: 32.891 > 90pct: 56.776 > Max: 74.282 > ............................................................. > Upload: 11.07 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.341 > 10pct: 18.669 > Median: 82.480 > Avg: 126.662 > 90pct: 248.102 > Max: 278.644 > > And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above: > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > ............................................................ > Download: 32.84 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.623 > 10pct: 16.077 > Median: 17.634 > Avg: 17.982 > 90pct: 19.653 > Max: 23.272 > ............................................................. > Upload: 8.25 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 16.001 > 10pct: 17.623 > Median: 19.796 > Avg: 19.820 > 90pct: 21.716 > Max: 23.228 > root@cerowrt:~# > > > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > > + openwrt merge > > ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem > > + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode > > and wpa+psk enabled... > > > > Get it at: > > > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ > > > > but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... > > > > - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of > > devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a > > bunch more tomorrow. > > > > - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's > > ntp, it seems.... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released 2014-04-06 0:08 ` Chuck Anderson @ 2014-04-06 0:57 ` Dave Taht 2014-04-06 4:48 ` Chuck Anderson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2014-04-06 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu> wrote: > And IPv6 over the HE tunnel: > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh -H netperf6.richb-hanover.com > Testing against netperf6.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > ............................................................................ > Download: 21.56 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 77 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 14.477 > 10pct: 15.469 > Median: 17.646 > Avg: 18.906 > 90pct: 23.540 > Max: 36.302 > ............................................................................ > Upload: 5.85 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 14.589 > 10pct: 15.579 > Median: 18.156 > Avg: 18.323 > 90pct: 21.192 > Max: 25.282 That's pretty lame compared to your ipv4 results, but the length of the path looks the same... puzzling... How much further (or less far) is rich's box (traceroute6 -n netperf6.richb-hanover.com) on ipv6 vs ipv4 (traceroute -n ) I have certainly seen bottlenecks, excessive delay, and packet loss on he's gateways. An "mtr" might be revealing during the test for spotting packet loss further on the path. > > > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:02:37PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1: >> >> First, without SQM enabled: >> >> root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh >> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) >> ............................................................ >> Download: 52.39 Mbps >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> Min: 15.281 >> 10pct: 18.302 >> Median: 28.502 >> Avg: 32.891 >> 90pct: 56.776 >> Max: 74.282 >> ............................................................. >> Upload: 11.07 Mbps >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> Min: 15.341 >> 10pct: 18.669 >> Median: 82.480 >> Avg: 126.662 >> 90pct: 248.102 >> Max: 278.644 >> >> And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above: >> >> root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh >> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) >> ............................................................ >> Download: 32.84 Mbps >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> Min: 15.623 >> 10pct: 16.077 >> Median: 17.634 >> Avg: 17.982 >> 90pct: 19.653 >> Max: 23.272 >> ............................................................. >> Upload: 8.25 Mbps >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> Min: 16.001 >> 10pct: 17.623 >> Median: 19.796 >> Avg: 19.820 >> 90pct: 21.716 >> Max: 23.228 >> root@cerowrt:~# >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: >> > + openwrt merge >> > ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem >> > + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode >> > and wpa+psk enabled... >> > >> > Get it at: >> > >> > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ >> > >> > but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... >> > >> > - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of >> > devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a >> > bunch more tomorrow. >> > >> > - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's >> > ntp, it seems.... > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released 2014-04-06 0:57 ` Dave Taht @ 2014-04-06 4:48 ` Chuck Anderson 2014-04-06 21:44 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Chuck Anderson @ 2014-04-06 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 05:57:44PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu> wrote: > > And IPv6 over the HE tunnel: > > > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh -H netperf6.richb-hanover.com > > Testing against netperf6.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > > ............................................................................ > > Download: 21.56 Mbps > > Latency: (in msec, 77 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > > Min: 14.477 > > 10pct: 15.469 > > Median: 17.646 > > Avg: 18.906 > > 90pct: 23.540 > > Max: 36.302 > > ............................................................................ > > Upload: 5.85 Mbps > > Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > > Min: 14.589 > > 10pct: 15.579 > > Median: 18.156 > > Avg: 18.323 > > 90pct: 21.192 > > Max: 25.282 > > That's pretty lame compared to your ipv4 results, but the length of > the path looks the same... puzzling... How much further (or less far) > is rich's box (traceroute6 -n netperf6.richb-hanover.com) on ipv6 vs > ipv4 (traceroute -n ) Without any testing going on: My traceroute [v0.82] a (::) Sun Apr 6 00:35:55 2014 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 2001:470:89c6:3::1 0.0% 25 1.7 1.7 1.4 3.4 0.4 2. canderson-2.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.i 0.0% 25 25.3 22.5 20.6 27.6 1.5 3. ge3-8.core1.nyc4.he.net 0.0% 25 17.2 21.1 16.0 37.6 5.3 4. 100ge5-1.core1.ash1.he.net 0.0% 25 25.2 25.7 21.4 34.9 3.7 5. xe-0.equinix.asbnva01.us.bb.gin. 33.3% 25 32.7 25.1 22.2 32.7 2.7 6. ae-6.r20.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt. 0.0% 25 24.0 27.3 22.5 41.3 5.0 7. ae-3.r04.atlnga05.us.bb.gin.ntt. 0.0% 25 43.9 40.4 36.7 53.3 4.5 8. xe-0-1-0-17.r04.atlnga05.us.ce.g 0.0% 25 47.8 41.5 35.7 50.3 4.5 9. ??? 10. 2604:180::65be:a189 0.0% 24 37.7 37.9 35.8 40.1 1.3 My traceroute [v0.82] a (0.0.0.0) Sun Apr 6 00:37:12 2014 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 172.30.42.65 0.0% 26 1.5 1.6 1.3 5.7 0.8 2. ??? 3. te-0-0-0-11-sur02.woburn.ma.bost 0.0% 25 25.1 11.0 8.8 25.1 3.4 4. be-62-ar01.needham.ma.boston.com 0.0% 25 87.9 65.4 10.4 684.5 168.8 5. he-2-7-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone 0.0% 25 15.7 19.9 15.7 27.6 2.9 6. ??? 7. ae3.nyc32.ip4.tinet.net 0.0% 25 28.6 23.2 16.0 49.7 9.1 8. xe-4-3-0.atl11.ip4.tinet.net 0.0% 25 50.3 49.3 46.4 66.2 4.7 9. ramnode-gw.ip4.tinet.net 0.0% 25 47.0 50.9 46.8 58.7 3.8 10. ??? 11. 23.226.232.80 0.0% 25 47.8 48.6 46.8 57.2 2.2 > > I have certainly seen bottlenecks, excessive delay, and packet loss on > he's gateways. > > An "mtr" might be revealing during the test for spotting packet loss > further on the path. SQM is now set to 60000/10000. During the IPv6 test: My traceroute [v0.82] a (::) Sun Apr 6 00:41:12 2014 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 2001:470:89c6:3::1 0.0% 138 2.7 1.8 1.2 17.7 1.4 2. canderson-2.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.i 0.0% 138 22.9 25.2 20.0 62.9 5.2 3. ge3-8.core1.nyc4.he.net 0.0% 137 22.5 25.0 16.2 143.6 11.9 4. 100ge5-1.core1.ash1.he.net 0.0% 137 22.6 29.0 21.2 72.7 7.1 5. xe-0.equinix.asbnva01.us.bb.gin. 40.1% 137 25.7 31.1 22.4 147.9 16.6 6. ae-6.r20.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt. 0.0% 137 22.9 29.5 22.1 72.0 8.2 7. ae-3.r04.atlnga05.us.bb.gin.ntt. 11.7% 137 37.1 41.4 36.2 74.5 5.4 8. xe-0-1-0-17.r04.atlnga05.us.ce.g 0.0% 137 39.9 43.6 35.8 79.9 6.8 9. ??? 10. 2604:180::65be:a189 0.0% 137 36.6 41.1 36.0 59.8 4.5 root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh -H netperf6.richb-hanover.com Testing against netperf6.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) .......................................................................... Download: 27.2 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 14.666 10pct: 15.606 Median: 18.254 Avg: 21.101 90pct: 29.038 Max: 55.143 ........................................................................... Upload: 6.57 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 14.753 10pct: 15.233 Median: 17.599 Avg: 17.591 90pct: 19.674 Max: 24.718 IPv4 test: root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) ............................................................ Download: 46.11 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 16.011 10pct: 16.463 Median: 19.134 Avg: 19.743 90pct: 22.525 Max: 28.650 ............................................................ . Upload: 8.97 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 16.214 10pct: 16.904 Median: 19.154 Avg: 19.151 90pct: 20.989 Max: 22.683 > > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:02:37PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > >> Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1: > >> > >> First, without SQM enabled: > >> > >> root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > >> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > >> ............................................................ > >> Download: 52.39 Mbps > >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > >> Min: 15.281 > >> 10pct: 18.302 > >> Median: 28.502 > >> Avg: 32.891 > >> 90pct: 56.776 > >> Max: 74.282 > >> ............................................................. > >> Upload: 11.07 Mbps > >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > >> Min: 15.341 > >> 10pct: 18.669 > >> Median: 82.480 > >> Avg: 126.662 > >> 90pct: 248.102 > >> Max: 278.644 > >> > >> And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above: > >> > >> root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > >> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > >> ............................................................ > >> Download: 32.84 Mbps > >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > >> Min: 15.623 > >> 10pct: 16.077 > >> Median: 17.634 > >> Avg: 17.982 > >> 90pct: 19.653 > >> Max: 23.272 > >> ............................................................. > >> Upload: 8.25 Mbps > >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > >> Min: 16.001 > >> 10pct: 17.623 > >> Median: 19.796 > >> Avg: 19.820 > >> 90pct: 21.716 > >> Max: 23.228 > >> root@cerowrt:~# > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > >> > + openwrt merge > >> > ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem > >> > + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode > >> > and wpa+psk enabled... > >> > > >> > Get it at: > >> > > >> > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ > >> > > >> > but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... > >> > > >> > - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of > >> > devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a > >> > bunch more tomorrow. > >> > > >> > - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's > >> > ntp, it seems.... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released 2014-04-06 4:48 ` Chuck Anderson @ 2014-04-06 21:44 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2014-04-06 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel While mtr is at best an unreliable measurement, your data certainly points to problems on the ipv6 portion of the path leading to your reduced ipv6 throughput figures. You might want to find another he gateway closer to you to use, or one better connected. he has pretty good forums if you'd like to engage them there... On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 05:57:44PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu> wrote: >> > And IPv6 over the HE tunnel: >> > >> > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh -H netperf6.richb-hanover.com >> > Testing against netperf6.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) >> > ............................................................................ >> > Download: 21.56 Mbps >> > Latency: (in msec, 77 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> > Min: 14.477 >> > 10pct: 15.469 >> > Median: 17.646 >> > Avg: 18.906 >> > 90pct: 23.540 >> > Max: 36.302 >> > ............................................................................ >> > Upload: 5.85 Mbps >> > Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> > Min: 14.589 >> > 10pct: 15.579 >> > Median: 18.156 >> > Avg: 18.323 >> > 90pct: 21.192 >> > Max: 25.282 >> >> That's pretty lame compared to your ipv4 results, but the length of >> the path looks the same... puzzling... How much further (or less far) >> is rich's box (traceroute6 -n netperf6.richb-hanover.com) on ipv6 vs >> ipv4 (traceroute -n ) > > Without any testing going on: > > My traceroute [v0.82] > a (::) Sun Apr 6 00:35:55 2014 > Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit > Packets Pings > Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev > 1. 2001:470:89c6:3::1 0.0% 25 1.7 1.7 1.4 3.4 0.4 > 2. canderson-2.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.i 0.0% 25 25.3 22.5 20.6 27.6 1.5 > 3. ge3-8.core1.nyc4.he.net 0.0% 25 17.2 21.1 16.0 37.6 5.3 > 4. 100ge5-1.core1.ash1.he.net 0.0% 25 25.2 25.7 21.4 34.9 3.7 > 5. xe-0.equinix.asbnva01.us.bb.gin. 33.3% 25 32.7 25.1 22.2 32.7 2.7 > 6. ae-6.r20.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt. 0.0% 25 24.0 27.3 22.5 41.3 5.0 > 7. ae-3.r04.atlnga05.us.bb.gin.ntt. 0.0% 25 43.9 40.4 36.7 53.3 4.5 > 8. xe-0-1-0-17.r04.atlnga05.us.ce.g 0.0% 25 47.8 41.5 35.7 50.3 4.5 > 9. ??? > 10. 2604:180::65be:a189 0.0% 24 37.7 37.9 35.8 40.1 1.3 > > > My traceroute [v0.82] > a (0.0.0.0) Sun Apr 6 00:37:12 2014 > Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit > Packets Pings > Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev > 1. 172.30.42.65 0.0% 26 1.5 1.6 1.3 5.7 0.8 > 2. ??? > 3. te-0-0-0-11-sur02.woburn.ma.bost 0.0% 25 25.1 11.0 8.8 25.1 3.4 > 4. be-62-ar01.needham.ma.boston.com 0.0% 25 87.9 65.4 10.4 684.5 168.8 > 5. he-2-7-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone 0.0% 25 15.7 19.9 15.7 27.6 2.9 > 6. ??? > 7. ae3.nyc32.ip4.tinet.net 0.0% 25 28.6 23.2 16.0 49.7 9.1 > 8. xe-4-3-0.atl11.ip4.tinet.net 0.0% 25 50.3 49.3 46.4 66.2 4.7 > 9. ramnode-gw.ip4.tinet.net 0.0% 25 47.0 50.9 46.8 58.7 3.8 > 10. ??? > 11. 23.226.232.80 0.0% 25 47.8 48.6 46.8 57.2 2.2 > > >> >> I have certainly seen bottlenecks, excessive delay, and packet loss on >> he's gateways. >> >> An "mtr" might be revealing during the test for spotting packet loss >> further on the path. > > SQM is now set to 60000/10000. > > During the IPv6 test: > > My traceroute [v0.82] > a (::) Sun Apr 6 00:41:12 2014 > Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit > Packets Pings > Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev > 1. 2001:470:89c6:3::1 0.0% 138 2.7 1.8 1.2 17.7 1.4 > 2. canderson-2.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.i 0.0% 138 22.9 25.2 20.0 62.9 5.2 > 3. ge3-8.core1.nyc4.he.net 0.0% 137 22.5 25.0 16.2 143.6 11.9 > 4. 100ge5-1.core1.ash1.he.net 0.0% 137 22.6 29.0 21.2 72.7 7.1 > 5. xe-0.equinix.asbnva01.us.bb.gin. 40.1% 137 25.7 31.1 22.4 147.9 16.6 > 6. ae-6.r20.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt. 0.0% 137 22.9 29.5 22.1 72.0 8.2 > 7. ae-3.r04.atlnga05.us.bb.gin.ntt. 11.7% 137 37.1 41.4 36.2 74.5 5.4 > 8. xe-0-1-0-17.r04.atlnga05.us.ce.g 0.0% 137 39.9 43.6 35.8 79.9 6.8 > 9. ??? > 10. 2604:180::65be:a189 0.0% 137 36.6 41.1 36.0 59.8 4.5 > > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh -H netperf6.richb-hanover.com > Testing against netperf6.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > .......................................................................... > Download: 27.2 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 14.666 > 10pct: 15.606 > Median: 18.254 > Avg: 21.101 > 90pct: 29.038 > Max: 55.143 > ........................................................................... > Upload: 6.57 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 76 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 14.753 > 10pct: 15.233 > Median: 17.599 > Avg: 17.591 > 90pct: 19.674 > Max: 24.718 > > IPv4 test: > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > ............................................................ > Download: 46.11 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 16.011 > 10pct: 16.463 > Median: 19.134 > Avg: 19.743 > 90pct: 22.525 > Max: 28.650 > ............................................................ > . Upload: 8.97 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 16.214 > 10pct: 16.904 > Median: 19.154 > Avg: 19.151 > 90pct: 20.989 > Max: 22.683 > >> > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:02:37PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> >> Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1: >> >> >> >> First, without SQM enabled: >> >> >> >> root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh >> >> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) >> >> ............................................................ >> >> Download: 52.39 Mbps >> >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> >> Min: 15.281 >> >> 10pct: 18.302 >> >> Median: 28.502 >> >> Avg: 32.891 >> >> 90pct: 56.776 >> >> Max: 74.282 >> >> ............................................................. >> >> Upload: 11.07 Mbps >> >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> >> Min: 15.341 >> >> 10pct: 18.669 >> >> Median: 82.480 >> >> Avg: 126.662 >> >> 90pct: 248.102 >> >> Max: 278.644 >> >> >> >> And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above: >> >> >> >> root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh >> >> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) >> >> ............................................................ >> >> Download: 32.84 Mbps >> >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> >> Min: 15.623 >> >> 10pct: 16.077 >> >> Median: 17.634 >> >> Avg: 17.982 >> >> 90pct: 19.653 >> >> Max: 23.272 >> >> ............................................................. >> >> Upload: 8.25 Mbps >> >> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) >> >> Min: 16.001 >> >> 10pct: 17.623 >> >> Median: 19.796 >> >> Avg: 19.820 >> >> 90pct: 21.716 >> >> Max: 23.228 >> >> root@cerowrt:~# >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> > + openwrt merge >> >> > ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem >> >> > + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode >> >> > and wpa+psk enabled... >> >> > >> >> > Get it at: >> >> > >> >> > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ >> >> > >> >> > but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... >> >> > >> >> > - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of >> >> > devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a >> >> > bunch more tomorrow. >> >> > >> >> > - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's >> >> > ntp, it seems.... > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released 2014-04-06 0:02 ` Chuck Anderson 2014-04-06 0:08 ` Chuck Anderson @ 2014-04-06 0:51 ` Dave Taht 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2014-04-06 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu> wrote: > Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1: > > First, without SQM enabled: > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > ............................................................ > Download: 52.39 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.281 > 10pct: 18.302 > Median: 28.502 > Avg: 32.891 > 90pct: 56.776 > Max: 74.282 > ............................................................. > Upload: 11.07 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.341 > 10pct: 18.669 > Median: 82.480 > Avg: 126.662 > 90pct: 248.102 > Max: 278.644 > > And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above: > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction) > ............................................................ > Download: 32.84 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.623 > 10pct: 16.077 > Median: 17.634 > Avg: 17.982 > 90pct: 19.653 > Max: 23.272 > ............................................................. > Upload: 8.25 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 16.001 > 10pct: 17.623 > Median: 19.796 > Avg: 19.820 > 90pct: 21.716 > Max: 23.228 > root@cerowrt:~# I think we are establishing that you can set downloads to above the measured value at above 22mbit. Please try again with download 60000, and pick another number for uploads higher than 80%. > > > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: >> + openwrt merge >> ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem >> + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode >> and wpa+psk enabled... >> >> Get it at: >> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ >> >> but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... >> >> - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of >> devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a >> bunch more tomorrow. >> >> - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's >> ntp, it seems.... > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-06 21:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-04-05 20:18 [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released Dave Taht 2014-04-06 0:02 ` Chuck Anderson 2014-04-06 0:08 ` Chuck Anderson 2014-04-06 0:57 ` Dave Taht 2014-04-06 4:48 ` Chuck Anderson 2014-04-06 21:44 ` Dave Taht 2014-04-06 0:51 ` Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox