From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net
	(ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670D021F21C;
	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802C4406062; 
	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: aqm@ietf.org, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:01:13 -0700
Message-Id: <20140429230113.802C4406062@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [aqm] the side effects of 330ms lag in
	the real world
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 23:01:14 -0000


> Also, what access method has 300 ms access latency, let alone 3 seconds?
> None that I know of, the meaningful comparison would be ADSL2+ at around
> 25ms and 3G at around 50-100ms. 

I have an old/slow 256Kbit SDSL link.

I frequently see download bloat delays of over 3 seconds.  I haven't seen 4, 
close, but not quite.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.