From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB53D21F387;
	Thu,  8 May 2014 03:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s48AHHP3020859
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
	verify=OK); Thu, 8 May 2014 06:17:18 -0400
Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-81.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.81])
	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP
	id s48AHGvC000349; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:17:16 -0400
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 12:17:13 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140508121713.4e4130eb@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <C35689EB-E4E9-4ECB-AD2A-11399D06AD82@gmail.com>
References: <C35689EB-E4E9-4ECB-AD2A-11399D06AD82@gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Cisco article about Bufferbloat
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 10:17:20 -0000

On Wed, 7 May 2014 09:20:51 -0400
Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:

> Cisco posted a note re: Bufferbloat and their PIE algorithm the other day. 
> 
> I added a comment that gives a little more background about the history
> of the problem, and acknowledges the work from the Bufferbloat project
> team, kernel developers, and other industry players to produce a good
> result.
> 
> Read both at: http://newsroom.cisco.com/feature-content?type=webcontent&articleId=1414442

Thank you Rich, for adding that comment.  I appreciate Cisco taking
bufferbloat seriously, but the article were a little too Cisco biased
towards who "invented" this stuff.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer