From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ccr.org (static-96-255-157-131.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.157.131]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C1B21F2E5 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 11:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ccr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D681A119C54; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 14:02:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ccr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C0A119C53 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 14:02:43 -0400 (EDT) To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:09:54 PDT." Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 14:02:43 -0400 From: Mike O'Dell Message-Id: <20140607180243.D681A119C54@ccr.org> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Cerowrt-devel Digest, Vol 31, Issue 4 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 18:02:53 -0000 excuse my naivete, but why on earth is homenet worried about "interior routers"? there shouldn't *be* any interior routers in a home network. ethernet switches, sure, but not routers. -mo