From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ccr.org (static-96-255-157-131.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.157.131]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8D721F2C5 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 12:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ccr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8206C119C54; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 15:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ccr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8141B119C53; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 15:20:49 -0400 (EDT) To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 07 Jun 2014 12:07:33 PDT." Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 15:20:49 -0400 From: Mike O'Dell Message-Id: <20140607192049.8206C119C54@ccr.org> Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Cerowrt-devel Digest, Vol 31, Issue 4 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 19:20:49 -0000 look at what John Moy did in the Cascade 9000s back circa 1997 he used OSFP, of course, instead of ISIS and he did full constraint resolution path identification along with with per-flow (aka VC) ingress rate monitoring which allowed completely distributed load shedding (policing) subject to a precedence lattice. once the path was identified the only rate management was at the ingress points, and that's only per-port state. extending the model it to carry ethernet MAC addresses isn't very hard. -mo