From: Matt Taggart <matt@lackof.org>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:35:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316203532.05BD21E2@taggart.lackof.org> (raw)
Hi cerowrt-devel,
My cable internet provider (Comcast) has been pestering me (monthly email
and robocalls) to upgrade my cable modem to something newer. But I _like_
my current one (no wifi, battery backup) and it's been very stable and can
handle the data rates I am paying for. But they are starting to roll out
faster service plans and I guess it would be good to have that option (and
eventually they will probably boost the speed of the plan I'm paying for).
So...
Any recommendations for cable modems that are known to be solid and less
bufferbloated?
I (like probably everyone on this list) will have router doing SQM/etc
connected to the device, so that reduces the damage large buffers in it can
do, but it would still be good to have something that designed well and to
reward a vendor that's paying attention.
My personal ideal is a simple device, cable-in gig ethernet out, and does
not have wifi, usb, do NAT, etc. (that's what cerowrt on the router/AP is
for). Are there DOCSIS 3.1 devices available yet? Or if those aren't
available/affordable, maybe an inexpensive but good 3.0?
Thanks,
--
Matt Taggart
matt@lackof.org
next reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-16 20:35 Matt Taggart [this message]
2015-03-17 23:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-18 4:34 ` David P. Reed
2015-03-18 6:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-18 19:38 ` JF Tremblay
2015-03-18 19:50 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-19 13:53 ` dpreed
2015-03-19 14:11 ` JF Tremblay
2015-03-19 15:38 ` dpreed
2015-03-19 15:40 ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-19 17:04 ` Michael Richardson
2015-03-19 17:14 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-19 17:11 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-19 19:58 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2015-03-19 20:29 ` dpreed
2015-03-19 23:18 ` Greg White
2015-03-20 8:18 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 13:31 ` David P. Reed
2015-03-20 13:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-20 14:05 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 10:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-20 13:50 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites (was: DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?) Rich Brown
2015-03-29 17:36 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-30 7:06 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-20 13:57 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation? Livingood, Jason
2015-03-20 14:08 ` David P. Reed
2015-03-20 14:14 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 14:48 ` Matt Mathis
2015-03-20 18:04 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-20 13:48 ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-20 14:11 ` Livingood, Jason
2015-03-20 14:54 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 15:31 ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-20 15:39 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 16:31 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-20 20:59 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 23:47 ` David P. Reed
2015-03-21 0:08 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21 0:03 ` David Lang
2015-03-21 0:13 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2015-03-21 0:25 ` David Lang
2015-03-21 0:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-21 0:38 ` David Lang
2015-03-21 0:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-22 4:15 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21 0:15 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21 0:29 ` David Lang
2015-03-22 4:10 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 18:14 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-18 8:06 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150316203532.05BD21E2@taggart.lackof.org \
--to=matt@lackof.org \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox