* [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
@ 2015-08-18 20:08 Matt Taggart
2015-08-18 20:33 ` Matt Taggart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matt Taggart @ 2015-08-18 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
Google is working with TP-LINK (and soon ASUS) on wifi (is there a
make-wifi-fast list this should have gone to?)
Google Blog: Meet OnHub: a new router for a new way to Wi-Fi
https://tinyurl.com/nloy3jm
product page
https://on.google.com/hub/
--
Matt Taggart
matt@lackof.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
2015-08-18 20:08 [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi Matt Taggart
@ 2015-08-18 20:33 ` Matt Taggart
2015-08-18 20:44 ` David Lang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matt Taggart @ 2015-08-18 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
Matt Taggart writes:
> Google is working with TP-LINK (and soon ASUS) on wifi (is there a
> make-wifi-fast list this should have gone to?)
>
> Google Blog: Meet OnHub: a new router for a new way to Wi-Fi
> https://tinyurl.com/nloy3jm
>
> product page
> https://on.google.com/hub/
I talked to a friend that worked on it:
<ggg> the kernel for the Onhub router is under "whirlwind" project
name in the chromium.org source tree. The firmware is coreboot and is
also public.
<ggg> Openwrt has all the support for the Qualcom chipset but not
this board.
<ggg> Openwrt also require fastboot and won't work with Coreboot.
<ggg> Key bits are the Device Tree description of the HW in this directory:
<ggg> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.14/arch/arm/boot/dts/
<ggg> qcom-apq8084-mtp.dts
<ggg> qcom-apq8084.dtsi
<ggg> qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dts
<ggg> qcom-ipq8064-arkham.dts
<ggg> qcom-ipq8064-storm.dts
<ggg> qcom-ipq8064-thermal.dtsi
<ggg> qcom-ipq8064-v1.0.dtsi
<ggg> qcom-ipq8064-whirlwind-sp3.dts
<ggg> qcom-ipq8064-whirlwind-sp5.dts
<ggg> qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
<ggg> whirlwind-sp5 is what shipped. (AFAIK)
<ggg> btw, all of this was reviewed on a public chromium.org gerrit
server.
<ggg> openwrt does support AP148
<ggg> and at some point chromeos was booting on AP148 though I don't
expect it to work "out of the box"
--
Matt Taggart
matt@lackof.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
2015-08-18 20:33 ` Matt Taggart
@ 2015-08-18 20:44 ` David Lang
2015-08-18 20:56 ` Dave Taht
2015-08-18 21:18 ` Matt Taggart
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Lang @ 2015-08-18 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Taggart; +Cc: cerowrt-devel
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Matt Taggart writes:
>> Google is working with TP-LINK (and soon ASUS) on wifi (is there a
>> make-wifi-fast list this should have gone to?)
>>
>> Google Blog: Meet OnHub: a new router for a new way to Wi-Fi
>> https://tinyurl.com/nloy3jm
>>
>> product page
>> https://on.google.com/hub/
>
> I talked to a friend that worked on it:
>
> <ggg> the kernel for the Onhub router is under "whirlwind" project
> name in the chromium.org source tree. The firmware is coreboot and is
> also public.
> <ggg> Openwrt has all the support for the Qualcom chipset but not
> this board.
> <ggg> Openwrt also require fastboot and won't work with Coreboot.
> <ggg> Key bits are the Device Tree description of the HW in this directory:
> <ggg> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.14/arch/arm/boot/dts/
> <ggg> qcom-apq8084-mtp.dts
> <ggg> qcom-apq8084.dtsi
> <ggg> qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dts
> <ggg> qcom-ipq8064-arkham.dts
> <ggg> qcom-ipq8064-storm.dts
> <ggg> qcom-ipq8064-thermal.dtsi
> <ggg> qcom-ipq8064-v1.0.dtsi
> <ggg> qcom-ipq8064-whirlwind-sp3.dts
> <ggg> qcom-ipq8064-whirlwind-sp5.dts
> <ggg> qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
> <ggg> whirlwind-sp5 is what shipped. (AFAIK)
> <ggg> btw, all of this was reviewed on a public chromium.org gerrit
> server.
> <ggg> openwrt does support AP148
> <ggg> and at some point chromeos was booting on AP148 though I don't
> expect it to work "out of the box"
sounds promising.
how open is the wifi driver? Is it something that we can dive into and modify
for make-wifi-fast? or is it a typical vendor blob?
David Lang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
2015-08-18 20:44 ` David Lang
@ 2015-08-18 20:56 ` Dave Taht
2015-08-19 17:38 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-09-22 22:08 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-08-18 21:18 ` Matt Taggart
1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2015-08-18 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Lang; +Cc: cerowrt-devel
I would like very much for someone from this group to put this box
through it's paces with flent on the isp side, and to test the wifi
side with the rtt_fair tests, and publish their results.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
2015-08-18 20:56 ` Dave Taht
@ 2015-08-19 17:38 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-08-19 18:09 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-09-22 22:08 ` Isaac Konikoff
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Isaac Konikoff @ 2015-08-19 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
Yep, planning to do just that...but already the marketing has got me
shaking my head... "AC1900 for Wi-Fi speeds up to 1900Mbps"
On 08/18/2015 01:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I would like very much for someone from this group to put this box
> through it's paces with flent on the isp side, and to test the wifi
> side with the rtt_fair tests, and publish their results.
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
2015-08-18 20:56 ` Dave Taht
2015-08-19 17:38 ` Isaac Konikoff
@ 2015-09-22 22:08 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-10-01 18:48 ` Isaac Konikoff
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Isaac Konikoff @ 2015-09-22 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel, bloat
Started testing an onhub box with lanforge and flent...just wifi to lan
side for now compared to a netgear r8000.
Configuration of the onhub is somewhat limited because you have to use
the google-on app and many settings are not available such as picking a
channel, setting ht/mcs rates, disabling encryption, etc... Also, it
appears that the wan port requires a live internet connection for any
functionality at all.
Here are some reports and data on what I've tested so far:
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2
Here are some sample plots from the data:
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/rtt_fair4be-box-plot-comparison.png
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/tcp-download-box-plot-comparison.png
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/10stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp-only.png
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/63stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp+tcp.png
I'm planning to do some more comparisons with other ap's or maybe some
additional flent tests to netperf.bufferbloat.net. I'll publish those
results when available.
Isaac
On 08/18/2015 01:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I would like very much for someone from this group to put this box
> through it's paces with flent on the isp side, and to test the wifi
> side with the rtt_fair tests, and publish their results.
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
2015-09-22 22:08 ` Isaac Konikoff
@ 2015-10-01 18:48 ` Isaac Konikoff
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Isaac Konikoff @ 2015-10-01 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel, bloat
Found an interesting way to bind firefox to an interface, so I can run
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest from eth1, sta1, sta2, etc...to test
the wifi to internet path of different APs even though it eventually all
goes through our main router at the cable modem.
http://www.ryde.net/code/bind.c.txt
Anyway, here are some results:
eth0 on my desktop: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1516977
eth1 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517395
sta1 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517298
sta2 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517364
eth1 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517769
sta1 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517821
sta2 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517871
On 09/22/2015 03:08 PM, Isaac Konikoff wrote:
> Started testing an onhub box with lanforge and flent...just wifi to lan
> side for now compared to a netgear r8000.
>
> Configuration of the onhub is somewhat limited because you have to use
> the google-on app and many settings are not available such as picking a
> channel, setting ht/mcs rates, disabling encryption, etc... Also, it
> appears that the wan port requires a live internet connection for any
> functionality at all.
>
> Here are some reports and data on what I've tested so far:
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2
>
> Here are some sample plots from the data:
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/rtt_fair4be-box-plot-comparison.png
>
>
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/tcp-download-box-plot-comparison.png
>
>
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/10stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp-only.png
>
>
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/63stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp+tcp.png
>
>
> I'm planning to do some more comparisons with other ap's or maybe some
> additional flent tests to netperf.bufferbloat.net. I'll publish those
> results when available.
>
> Isaac
>
> On 08/18/2015 01:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> I would like very much for someone from this group to put this box
>> through it's paces with flent on the isp side, and to test the wifi
>> side with the rtt_fair tests, and publish their results.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
2015-08-18 20:44 ` David Lang
2015-08-18 20:56 ` Dave Taht
@ 2015-08-18 21:18 ` Matt Taggart
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matt Taggart @ 2015-08-18 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Lang; +Cc: cerowrt-devel
David Lang writes:
> how open is the wifi driver? Is it something that we can dive into and modify
> for make-wifi-fast? or is it a typical vendor blob?
more info..
ath10k
<ggg> ChromeOS uses tools to share/merge config files. The config parts
specific to OnHub are here: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.14/chromeos/config/armel/chromiumos-ipq806x.flavour.config
<ggg> it's using a v3.18 kernel mac80211 code base. (USE="wireless318")
--
Matt Taggart
matt@lackof.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-01 18:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-18 20:08 [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi Matt Taggart
2015-08-18 20:33 ` Matt Taggart
2015-08-18 20:44 ` David Lang
2015-08-18 20:56 ` Dave Taht
2015-08-19 17:38 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-08-19 18:09 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-08-19 18:16 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-09-22 22:08 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-10-01 18:48 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-08-18 21:18 ` Matt Taggart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox