From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vs18.mail.saunalahti.fi (vs18.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.117.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C458F3B2E1 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 02:56:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vams (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vs18.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C04B18007D for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:56:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.111]) by vs18.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2424718007D for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:56:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from radio2 (dsl-jnsbrasgw2-58c076-229.dhcp.inet.fi [88.192.118.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2B5E20065 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:56:19 +0300 (EEST) Received: from ebirdie by radio2 with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqbCJ-0003jz-Nq for cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:56:15 +0300 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:56:15 +0300 From: Erkki Lintunen To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20160414065615.GA14284@radio2.ebirdie> Mail-Followup-To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] update on that nuc I was fighting with X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 06:56:22 -0000 * Dave Taht [2016-04-13 17:11:44 -0700]: > Hoo, boy, did I have issues. I finally got around to trying to get it > up and running linux. > > For reference, this was the: > > - Jetway NU93-2930 NUC Form Factor Intel Celeron N2930 SoC Bay Trail 2 ... > Well, it turns out there is a BIOS fix here, which I have not installed yet. Matthew Garrett's blog-post might give peace of mind. and especially in it's comments are info about Intel chip microcode versions. One might only get microcode through Jetway and Jetway (at least I have doubts) might be a vendor not giving much concern toward other OSs. E.g. the comments in Garrett's blog say Windows AHCI driver handles power-states ok, so the issues with Linux may not be a priority to Jetway unless in volume made known to it. Nice info for me also as I was about to upgrade an old Pentium box running 24x7 to a Bay Trail platform, but have to put it on hold and watch on this as the comments also reference to Intel's caution about theirs chips long term reliability if the power-states aren't right. - Erkki