From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from complete.lackof.org (complete.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0223B260 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:58:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from taggart.lackof.org (c-24-22-132-166.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [24.22.132.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "taggart.lackof.org", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by complete.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BADF33E00BF for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:58:00 -0700 (MST) Received: by taggart.lackof.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08268202; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:58:00 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0-4) with nmh-1.6 From: Matt Taggart To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:58:00 -0800 Message-Id: <20161214005800.08268202@taggart.lackof.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on complete.lackof.org Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR3800 improvements? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:58:01 -0000 Hi, I love the WNDR3800 platform, it's been great over the years first with cerowrt and then openwrt. Of the many I've deployed I have only had hardware problems with 2 of them, and usually uptimes go over 100 days. You can also still buy them used for $20 w/free shipping on amazon! With the recent improvement for cake, make-wifi-fast, driver improvements, etc is there any chance in seeing some of these things land for the WNDR3800 specifically? It would be really nice if this hardware could continue to do SQM, etc for some of the faster broadband speeds the cable providers are offering (comcast xfinity has 100, 200, 250 plans now) and see some of the wifi improvements too. Thanks, -- Matt Taggart matt@lackof.org