From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5063B2A4; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:43:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B811F61D05; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 08:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-200-32.brq.redhat.com [10.40.200.32]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E086D7B8FF; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 08:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:43:05 +0100 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer To: Dave Taht Cc: Dave Taht , bloat , Christina Jacob , Joel =?UTF-8?B?V2ly?= =?UTF-8?B?xIFtdQ==?= Pauling , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , David Ahern , Tariq Toukan , brouer@redhat.com Message-ID: <20171207094305.5aa14ba0@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <92906bd8-7bad-945d-83c8-a2f9598aac2c@lackof.org> <87bmjff7l6.fsf_-_@nemesis.taht.net> <20171204110923.3a213986@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Linux network is damn fast, need more use XDP (Was: DC behaviors today) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:43:13 -0000 On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 09:00:41 -0800 Dave Taht wrote: > Jesper: > > I have a tendency to deal with netdev by itself and never cross post > there, as the bufferbloat.net servers (primarily to combat spam) > mandate starttls and vger doesn't support it at all, thus leading to > raising davem blood pressure which I'd rather not do. Sorry, I didn't know. I've removed the bloat-lists from the reply I just gave to Matthias on netdev: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171207093343.071083ff@redhat.com And I'll refrain from cross-posting between these lists in the future. -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer