Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Cake] mo bettah open source multi-party videoconferncing in an age of bloated uplinks
@ 2020-03-27 21:34 Hal Murray
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hal Murray @ 2020-03-27 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David P. Reed
  Cc: Hal Murray, bloat, Make-Wifi-fast, Cake List, cerowrt-devel,
	Ken Rice, Anthony Minessale II


> I hate putting things in the kernel! It's insecure. But what this says is
> that for very historical and stupid reasons (related to the ideas of early
> timesharing systems like Unix and Multics) folks try to make real-time
> algorithms look like ordinary "processes" whose notion of controlling
> temporal behavior is abstracted away. 

Could you please say more.

Why doesn't it work to put the time critical stuff in a separate light weight 
thread and give it higher priority than the stuff that needs lots of CPU?

Is the problem in the scheduler?  Is background junk overloading the system?
(Are people rebuilding the kernel while video converencing?)

Is it too hard to split out the logic that would go in the light weight 
thread? (get tangled on locks or such)


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-03-27 21:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-27 21:34 [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Cake] mo bettah open source multi-party videoconferncing in an age of bloated uplinks Hal Murray

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox