* [Cerowrt-devel] v6 vs v4
@ 2013-01-04 2:43 Michael Richardson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Richardson @ 2013-01-04 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
Is there any reason I should expect fq_codel to work less well when the
elephant flow is (native) v6 rather than v4?
I started a 1.6G rsync over ssh from my home to office at noon today.
Subsquently, the ogg/mp3 streaming (over http port 81) that I usually do
to play music at work became very poor. It wasn't consistently bad.
Or I'm hitting port-22 priority vs port-81 best effort?
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-01-04 2:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-04 2:43 [Cerowrt-devel] v6 vs v4 Michael Richardson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox