From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Cc: Neil Davies <neil.davies@pnsol.com>,
cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Check out www.speedof.me - no Flash
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:29:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25037.1406327367@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:20:53 -0700." <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407251415570.21739@nftneq.ynat.uz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 820 bytes --]
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:20:53 -0700, David Lang said:
> cost of bandwidth for this is just something to get someone to pay for (ideally
> someone with tons of bandwidth already who won't notice this sort of test, even
> if there are a few going on at once.)
Ask U of Wisconsin how that worked out for them when Netgear shipped some
new boxes....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTP_server_misuse_and_abuse#NETGEAR_and_the_University_of_Wisconsin.E2.80.93Madison
It's one thing to come up with a solution that works for the 300 (total wild guess) people
on this list. But to be useful for field deployable, it really needs to be able
to handle a "every Comcast customer in a major metro area", because we *do*
want this stuff to work well when this makes it into the CPE that Comcast
gives every new customer, right? :)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 848 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-20 13:19 [Cerowrt-devel] " Rich Brown
2014-07-20 13:27 ` David P. Reed
2014-07-20 18:41 ` [Cerowrt-devel] SIMET: nationwide bw/latency/jitter test effort in Brazil Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 5:36 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Check out www.speedof.me - no Flash Alex Elsayed
2014-07-25 9:10 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Neil Davies
2014-07-25 12:09 ` Rich Brown
2014-07-25 12:24 ` Neil Davies
2014-07-25 14:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 14:25 ` Martin Geddes
2014-07-25 15:58 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 16:32 ` Martin Geddes
2014-07-25 17:12 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 17:14 ` Neil Davies
2014-07-25 17:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 17:29 ` Martin Geddes
2014-07-25 21:13 ` David Lang
2014-07-25 22:17 ` dpreed
2014-07-25 23:26 ` David Lang
2014-07-26 13:02 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-26 20:53 ` David Lang
2014-07-26 22:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-26 22:30 ` David Lang
2014-07-26 23:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-26 20:16 ` Neil Davies
2014-07-25 14:27 ` Neil Davies
2014-07-25 16:02 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 21:20 ` David Lang
2014-07-25 22:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2014-07-25 23:30 ` David Lang
2014-07-26 12:53 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-07-25 15:05 ` David P. Reed
2014-07-25 15:46 ` Rich Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25037.1406327367@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=neil.davies@pnsol.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox