From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] measuring bandwidth and latency with snmp
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 07:53:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29775.1401537202@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 May 2014 23:05:24 -0700." <CAA93jw7z-xYRqQy3z0vYdCjtCiOh_aiqyArmMMYC35UPqTC-ow@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1146 bytes --]
On Fri, 30 May 2014 23:05:24 -0700, Dave Taht said:
> There's no need to do ping.You can just measure the
> time it takes to issue and get the snmp query response.
>
> Am I missing something obvious?
For devices with separate control and data planes, it's quite possible
to have 3 different numbers:
1) The time it takes for the data plane to receive and forward a packet.
2) The time it takes for the data or control plane to generate an ICMP response
3) The time it takes for the control plane to do slowpath handling of a
relatively heavy SNMP packet.
It's why traceroute often gives you wonky timing numbers and reports RTTs
to a middle hop are higher than to the destination. It's because the
router was able to forward packets much faster than the slowpath to generate
the ICMP TTL Exceeded reply....
For longer hauls, there's the added fun that the source and destination may
not be in the same administrative domain - I have smokeping running on
a Raspberry Pi to measure from local Comcast to work. My personal device
and the work box in a different group are *never* going to speak SNMP to each other. :)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 848 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-31 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-31 6:05 Dave Taht
2014-05-31 11:53 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29775.1401537202@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox