From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C445821F510 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle.home.lan ([217.237.68.126]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M86jp-1alCuA0Ukr-00vhaw; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:47:15 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:47:17 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2E44924D-90DF-4BC2-A393-88838960A73F@gmx.de> References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> To: Aaron Wood X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lexDieV7u0LHJ+RiOIfwBgwh/bkPto9mVC3ZgT1lZ0423qAEkOp tkUF9+CKuZXdqNjcwFnT5r55NAIJflhd2h0bO+6J/MBswqXPvhF0xkyFaWpunfyQtynvenD RvF+ky7lgxrw3vVpy7nquxOy6qAAl3/9PSq4Pr3SHyVzDuydxSf+m6z+2lyL0Ul2VTRl15i 4Vo7bx6vgR9sQJXcsuG6w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gWxDMIxhSvI=:fnq7SzwbhnIwRVQG0gP/9q gKjnwBS4XGQwQcRDJTZBxtaX1tK6uemlaSJDwe0iC33ijWcvwHvDz51HI/2Iw22R4Npdjox8f MCNjRR5Pt8F17Ydq/Q64pNwsoA4dQ3L2NkDAdbUoRfHgRiabWLSwglGJaUYqfRng2xbQxYMkM NSaiNb8Ag23BkQQpMi5bPkaKZ6ADnfHDBmNIo2WavkGWaI0KSopjeVrM29FpTxMW8JN7YN0Zu pBE4tVShicG1qkVuu1choesZeMxejAGRCkaAWoyVUKBEfKIUzJ4gHr/E+nx8UI+IADmU60SI0 AF7hSbJuK+HnQNN6WasRpZxwxBaZouEht6tZdjdzxGpGaNFfpELzVs/ZN36gTi+fz3VdbO4ec se3aDdtmhADfDsUHSj+5Qc6JAasjVI283+UkMzuvcuL3DCXCOVSc6bqEoGNHXdBkjipsfp42q gzMIra6MlHq95k8ZujcT/W8E5BLlr65lbmlhnaC5GqZwXCWsqqZrPG0KxZI7M+o+lg6K7xYou 6OGF677fiQnoadjcWKH9+b8EA9mXsdqfo/dt5CyxjYYaC+jOahBXWO3T8eoVGpyADWjLGDVlu l7kwGpwNzuVh+xX1Zz7aMhfwCvj8k6R2rmlV/muVROuZR45mTOw1S0BSM/oyrbAArp5KvaGtf psvI5cJrRySK6uWvrpfAmRkH5qMr03nbzyEaY1jYcwNkvmJfz/h9f81VGhThz7AmeOb3koMyf XrSTvx7xwSZdqTz5+rlre0VfoW5ol0V++5b7QJwhOfuHbh8ivm2+0lPCq/U1G1ao8ypZa2Sfd IUF1VUJ Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:47:40 -0000 Hi Aaron, On Oct 23, 2015, at 19:22 , Aaron Wood wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Richard Smith = wrote: > I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test. >=20 > I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory = firmware vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled. >=20 > Here are my results with the same router (unless the WRT1900ACS is = different from the WRT1900AC): I believe the ACS is the success or the AC, basically using the = same SoC @higher frequency as the 1200AC, which tested very well in = Mikael=92s tests recently. > = http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2015/06/sqmscripts-before-and-after-at-160= mbps.html But that looks quite nice=85 Best Regards Sebastian >=20 > =20 > So I built and installed an openwrt trunk but the results were very = non-impressive. Rrul test reported mulit-seconds of latency and it was = equally non-impressive with sqm enabled or disabled. So I assumed that = sqm in trunk on this device must not work yet. Then I wondered how well = sqm in trunk was tested and that perhaps its broken for all devices. >=20 > Trunk or the Chaos Calmer release? (I"m running CC RC1) > =20 > My test setup: >=20 > Laptop<--1000BaseT-->DUT<--1000baseT-->Server >=20 > Which ports on the DUT were you using? are those local ports, or is = one of those the "internet" port? > =20 > -Aaron > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel