* [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM
@ 2013-11-11 19:40 Michael Richardson
2013-11-11 19:56 ` Paul Handly
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Richardson @ 2013-11-11 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
I need to do some testing of PPPoE, DHCPv6 (RFC6204/homenet) with an
OpenWRT/CeroWRT.
I want to do this virtually, so an x86 build would be best. I grabbed the kvm
image of openwrt attitude adjustment, as per:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/qemu
and
http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/
it appears that it hasn't got any IPv6 stuff in it. I thought that all this
stuff from openwrt went upstream? Is 12.09 perhaps just too old?
My choices are, I guess:
1) build cerowrt for x86
2) build latest openwrt from source
Or did I miss an obvious image?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM
2013-11-11 19:40 [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM Michael Richardson
@ 2013-11-11 19:56 ` Paul Handly
2013-11-12 15:16 ` Michael Richardson
2013-11-11 20:13 ` Dave Taht
2013-11-12 15:26 ` Denis Ovsienko
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Handly @ 2013-11-11 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
OpenWRT doesn't cut releases too often; you should find a much more
recent build here:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/x86/
--
Paul Handly <paul@hand.ly>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013, at 14:40, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> I need to do some testing of PPPoE, DHCPv6 (RFC6204/homenet) with an
> OpenWRT/CeroWRT.
>
> I want to do this virtually, so an x86 build would be best. I grabbed the
> kvm
> image of openwrt attitude adjustment, as per:
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/qemu
> and
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/
>
> it appears that it hasn't got any IPv6 stuff in it. I thought that all
> this
> stuff from openwrt went upstream? Is 12.09 perhaps just too old?
>
> My choices are, I guess:
> 1) build cerowrt for x86
> 2) build latest openwrt from source
>
> Or did I miss an obvious image?
>
> --
> ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh
> networks [
> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network
> architect [
> ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails
> [
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM
2013-11-11 19:40 [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM Michael Richardson
2013-11-11 19:56 ` Paul Handly
@ 2013-11-11 20:13 ` Dave Taht
2013-11-12 15:26 ` Denis Ovsienko
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2013-11-11 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Richardson; +Cc: cerowrt-devel
I have had multiple requests for an x86 vm. I tried several times but
never got anything that even booted. And ENOBUDGET to make it work,
and ENOTIME to keep it working.
I do take patches, and all that is really needed for a cerowrt build
would be a new build script, .config file, and a working filesystem.
I'd argue for straight openwrt and/or see if you can leverage a trunk
build. Everything you describe has made it to openwrt "barrier
breaker" trunk already.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
> I need to do some testing of PPPoE, DHCPv6 (RFC6204/homenet) with an
> OpenWRT/CeroWRT.
>
> I want to do this virtually, so an x86 build would be best. I grabbed the kvm
> image of openwrt attitude adjustment, as per:
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/qemu
> and
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/
>
> it appears that it hasn't got any IPv6 stuff in it. I thought that all this
> stuff from openwrt went upstream? Is 12.09 perhaps just too old?
>
> My choices are, I guess:
> 1) build cerowrt for x86
> 2) build latest openwrt from source
>
> Or did I miss an obvious image?
>
> --
> ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
> ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM
2013-11-11 19:40 [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM Michael Richardson
2013-11-11 19:56 ` Paul Handly
2013-11-11 20:13 ` Dave Taht
@ 2013-11-12 15:26 ` Denis Ovsienko
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis Ovsienko @ 2013-11-12 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
> it appears that it hasn't got any IPv6 stuff in it. I thought that all this
> stuff from openwrt went upstream? Is 12.09 perhaps just too old?
I don't know about x86, but 12.09 built for plastic routers has IPv6 off by default. This page describes how to get IPv6 working (and some IPv6-only packages do have dependency on kmod-ipv6): http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/ipv6.essentials
--
Denis Ovsienko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-12 15:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-11 19:40 [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM Michael Richardson
2013-11-11 19:56 ` Paul Handly
2013-11-12 15:16 ` Michael Richardson
2013-11-11 20:13 ` Dave Taht
2013-11-12 15:26 ` Denis Ovsienko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox