From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-x234.google.com (mail-qe0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 337E521F112 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id s1so1847877qeb.25 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:29:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ks32xKeEme6DHUC/VcWDWelAmzZjSYAcMVfwM1Hse/g=; b=dvtLxgJcZllqJSyOCvn0Pt5xLs7RySA4J32TBM2IMgWroWt6sIAJfuYiQgusJJo3Ze Wh8qowQ5qwygfNyPTXvsjhg9t+/jx9gg3fLP64/xhAo1IyiZZPbEKXedqC2UaoqE0nlc wMpzPrj1brB8wR51uqrCOFvGAAqS8hDG1/geb85jE7PiQVRqIjMh1jbnk5zH8A+dZdIc 8zIScgXLW5v0ssJQFjELvrByn5U01uFImz86Q05w/zafdxMe1uoDybfu8USF1O/qhh1T foPV00KKvF+uWOeu5Au2PFrtJRQrezEfWBWJriZozezESU1m4PS+8U0vo8o4d+fR80Ux KYJA== X-Received: by 10.229.184.69 with SMTP id cj5mr20264375qcb.8.1389457745042; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-2018.home.lan ([64.223.225.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f19sm16944455qaq.12.2014.01.11.08.29.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:29:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: <01558084-B7D8-448A-A4ED-CE36D18AAA97@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:29:02 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <376B7057-E1D6-4F7C-BD59-9F5EDF9B418C@gmail.com> References: <01558084-B7D8-448A-A4ED-CE36D18AAA97@gmail.com> To: cerowrt-devel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM Question #5: Link Layer Adaptation Overheads X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:29:14 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:29:14 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:29:14 -0000 Folks, Thanks for all the good responses to this question. I have incorporated = the info into the SQM page on the wiki, so that it now gives broad = recommendations for each link type, and refers people to the (new) = =93Everything you wanted to know about Link Layer Adaptation=94 page. This allows someone coming to CeroWrt for the first time to set up their = router and get decent results that will be vastly better than any other = router/firmware combo that they might encounter.=20 I think this makes our project more approachable, while still giving an = inquiring mind the ability to tune their own installation.=20 You can read the new pages at: = http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Setting_up_AQM_for_CeroWr= t_310 -and- = http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Everything_you_wanted_to_= know_about_Link_Layer_Adaptation Rich=