From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19CC421F36C for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle.lan ([134.2.89.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lcj9b-1ZEtJd22yd-00k7zi; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:26:18 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:26:17 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <392ED808-5A42-488D-919B-08EBE8236D40@gmx.de> References: <7DFEBF4E-513B-4F41-B559-46BC9857AB40@gmail.com> <5501F7B7.9040105@gmail.com> <17E04C4E-CB66-4E83-A082-566904A88A32@toke.dk> To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mvkMZCuqrNtWeQFdG1uCJ9FhXguhGNenJYmtTd4lX+2JIfoaurZ rKGXMAL94ziPOGTqbGlHjdFHW5gBNKpDtPgC9PIu6wUwgxYOwhu6YbdF0JrP40D5qywsRzD oUZWrr3TxKj9hYal4BSWpc5TEtBTYJa+A/gvSDOengYVNQFNo1uumPaUU/3E0fmF6ItiXsj X9F2icIDZHD2zMdPisU8Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: Alan Jenkins , cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt bits not in OpenWrt (renamed thread) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:26:50 -0000 On Mar 12, 2015, at 22:59 , Dave Taht wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen = wrote: >>=20 >>> sqm-scripts / luci-app-sqm is only available from CC (trunk). The = CC >>> version can be installed manually, but it will complain & leave you >>> with >>> warnings about it on every subsequent package install. >>=20 >> Note that we've been discussing backporting it to BB, but had one = outstanding bug that we fixed recently. Been waiting until that fix has = been out in CC for sufficiently long to weed out any adverse effects, = then we'll get it into BB as well if possible :) >=20 > I wouldn't mind restarting work on cake, either, as it simplifies the > sqm-scripts tremendously, and (in it's present form) is mildly faster. >=20 > Also exploring the existing policing options would be good at the > higher rates. For an example of use see the last set of comments on > wondershaper must die. And then there's "bobbie", which would be worth > a paper for anyone that wants to talk to me then write it=85. I guess, it should be relatively simple to introduce a sign to = sqm=92s bandwidth fields, with positive denoting HTB shaping, negative = simple policing (and zero stays at no shaping or policing); it is not = that we have not already =93overloaded=94 the bandwidth field already = ;). That way we can keep everything in simple.qos making it more likely = people will actually be able to test it=85 (Currently I have a temporary = 100/40 Mbps link so I want to try the policer anyway ;) ) Now if thee was a cerowrt re-spin that added cake, that would be = great Best Regards Sebastian >=20 >=20 >=20 >>=20 >> -Toke >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht > Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! >=20 > https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel