From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com (mail-ea0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224BB21F1BB for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id o10so1257865eaj.27 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:39:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=eYr1OhQ5dPV/blQmvraNzqHSXtvzq4SIaIlfkyn3fw8=; b=no3KT1z8+1ZahN3u/gcYK2N/1T2J6iN5GWF+f9AhB8Oij7KXgy7hJbqr80VByVqdiX +V1aBal/XZ7D+flKKkH2Oi8qzvfHJJBUIOMBtZqgPSYgmNg0YECnCEQdoIJAo2FUzwgR wIm1R3qV1+Qd7zikOSZaBnCkQ+Ccpviu/kvgBZ4bWsdmJukoU19U8fqgzKJNoOuN9wzq VJ0qDXSIMGHdukBN+m5JnP/dPt21V2Ppzts76cTAZ5l8lht9wty33UxRB32Ch+AT23xp 8YEneBzAIgJ72jIczL8jyLRO/5Ro9Y9eToJdGukSRxEPOd54r8A+AGlOB6XlQB55ASrK ZhCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmOGIbNQUH5L89ncrYtgDXwRPe6lk6jjsomBOc/uEMjYp9tIli0bIqlL8Qalpl75XCBb/xa X-Received: by 10.14.200.132 with SMTP id z4mr4943781een.14.1376689189706; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.175.173.26] (524A14A4.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [82.74.20.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r48sm5472379eev.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) From: Teco Boot In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 23:39:46 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3A55505F-43AD-4D72-A5CA-5DFFB03FDD17@inf-net.nl> References: To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , Juliusz Chroboczek , Steven Barth , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] IPv6 address assignment and naming X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:39:52 -0000 The backtraces were not caused by the ip6_subtrees patch. It is Ubuntu = that upgraded me to 3.8.0.28, with some free bugs. I went back to = 3.8.0.27. No problems since then. Teco Op 16 aug. 2013, om 23:35 heeft Dave Taht het = volgende geschreven: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Teco Boot wrote: > The IPv6 subtrees in on its way :-). After 3.11 we can ask for = backports. >=20 > I folded it into cerowrt 3.10.7-1 just now. No noise on the patch. I = was scared by some of the backtraces you posted, so I'd like to keep the = testing simple for a while... and...=20 >=20 > I still have the ADSL htb fixes to fold back in from 3.11 to 3.10, to = massively update cisco's pie implementation, and to make one more tweak = to codel, before I do anything other than compile testing, personally.=20= >=20 > Probably will be a couple days. >=20 > I have no idea the state of the babel branch on this stuff. My own use = case is a system with multiple 6rd, 6in4, 6to4 tunnels in play....=20 >=20 > One of my concerns was that: is there an easy way to detect at runtime = via netlink if subtrees was working correctly or not? >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht >=20 > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: = http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html