Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] The Great Renaming (of netperf-wrapper): Final contenders

[Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1496 bytes --]

I like names based on bashing or smashing.

Not so sure about "flent" - see http://www.amazon.com/Flents-Stopples-Cotton-Plugs-Packaging/dp/B003U76CEI

Rich
On Apr 13, 2015, at 5:48 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:

> Hi everyone
> 
> The Great Renaming (of netperf-wrapper) has now entered its final phase
> (i.e., I have to make a decision now). There's a couple of contenders
> for a new name, see below. I'd like some feedback on which you prefer. A
> simple "This one!" is fine, but reasoning about why is also appreciated,
> of course :)
> 
> So, without further ado, the contenders are:
> 
> - "ENT: The Extensible Network Tester".
>  Possible name clash: https://packages.debian.org/sid/ent
> 
> - "Exnett: The EXtensible NETwork Tester"
>   Avoids the name clash; the second t is important for this.
> 
> - "Flent: The Flexible Network Tester"
>  'Flent' is also the sound a bufferbloated network makes when subjected
>  to testing :)
> 
> - "NetBasher"
> 
> For the first three, the abbreviation would probably be the everyday
> name, name of the executable, etc, with the expansion added in
> descriptions where appropriate.
> 
> 
> Please comment by Thursday, as I have a deadline for something that
> needs to include the name then...
> 
> Thanks in advance! :)
> 
> -Toke
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 496 bytes --]