From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A1D921F309
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun,  2 Mar 2014 17:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id rd18so3655597iec.1
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun, 02 Mar 2014 17:49:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=6BGnfJkqjDPy1dXpixV0MIbxvZZWn+KRHHbH3rxNakk=;
	b=n5B9ZNWZFA104jDmikIpsAnemdhSYrSDeFxNEToO9wMQ+oiEuxU770tUuWuJlr2Tjs
	tA6i6h+NxjxaSQAgnr7WDVqN+l7VNIslC2YgONB9rYE6u0QyiBWcDShJ/iKGDSjjcYh9
	mv0GBrROliK3ojTaGRy+WqAOOdfaB+bazMFi2yvXf6Gf+xiLecaYiCPrsnZ86JhbMU1D
	azzpnF90MXgjakVFlGnVwI2J7idk2mW6IwhfmoXfX6c+bLo60+yEqKSFDffpHabcFxYA
	tL5mq2w4X2v0Ikw/HWf2BEOeZ6YPTUaZuEvgilQuEg6QkDuFOYexVESBLBaHH4SZY6qO
	vArA==
X-Received: by 10.50.111.79 with SMTP id ig15mr19253868igb.14.1393811360738;
	Sun, 02 Mar 2014 17:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from richs-mbp-4004.home.lan
	(d-ptld-bng1-70-16-218-239.ngn.east.myfairpoint.net. [70.16.218.239])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v2sm34248451igk.7.2014.03.02.17.49.19
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sun, 02 Mar 2014 17:49:19 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7zyPwY2VK-+vBa32DbdMwnUGx4+fXO2b2U_k2d1xxyTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:49:08 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3C58F2F0-60C0-4EC3-A45F-6895227DC889@gmail.com>
References: <5EC471C4-64B9-4D83-AB78-5219E2090886@gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw750w48b2B7Q5EFQq2r3eb2yWG3N_bvHG0N42hbrwN-tA@mail.gmail.com>
	<78561C59-590A-421E-A92D-7B93B084A6AA@gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw7zyPwY2VK-+vBa32DbdMwnUGx4+fXO2b2U_k2d1xxyTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better results from CeroWrt 3.10.28-16
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:49:21 -0000

Dave,

> Target 30ms would be interesting. 30+ % packet loss on this test (and
> your link is still operable!)

Wait. How can you detect the packet loss from the data I sent along?

> At your speed range the behavior of the tcp upload is governed by the
> initial window size more than anything else. I doubt the
> mac adjusts that properly so it keeps hammering away at it... my
> concern from looking at your upload graphs was that you were
> actually getting hammered so hard you were actually going through RTO
> (receive timeout) on the uploads.

Yuck. That would be bad.

re: Wireshark. I'll try to get it soon.

Thanks.

Rich