From: Matt Taggart <matt@lackof.org>
To: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] x86 router boxes with 2.5G ports
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 12:19:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b8d2a54-5dcb-ad80-e443-80a9d3ee69ac@lackof.org> (raw)
Serve the Home https://www.servethehome.com/ have been doing a bunch of
reviews of some fanless router mini-PCs similar to the Qotom that I
researched before and got a couple of(which have been great). They have
been buying them from Aliexpress and they are mostly the ‘Topton’ brand,
but also some similar no-name units. What is particularly cool is they
are now coming with 4-6 Intel 2.5Gbit I225 NICs.
Here’s a bunch of links
* A 6x 2.5GbE Intel Pentium N6005 Fanless OPNsense pfSense Firewall Option
https://www.servethehome.com/a-6x-2-5gbe-intel-pentium-n6005-fanless-opnsense-pfsense-firewall-option/
* Topton Intel N5095 4x 2.5GbE Firewall Review
https://www.servethehome.com/topton-intel-n5095-4x-2-5gbe-firewall-review/
* Cheap Intel Pentium N6005 4x 2.5GbE Fanless Firewall and Router Review
https://www.servethehome.com/cheap-intel-pentium-n6005-4x-2-5gbe-fanless-firewall-and-router-review/
* Topton Jasper Lake Quad i225V Mini PC Report forum
https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/topton-jasper-lake-quad-i225v-mini-pc-report.36699/
* Two Fanless Intel Celeron N5105 4x 2.5GbE Options Reviewed
https://www.servethehome.com/two-fanless-intel-celeron-n5105-4x-2-5gbe-options-reviewed/
* video review
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZK1l9bXDgs
Here are the CPUs they seem to come with (in StH’s preferrred order by
price/perf/wattage)
model, family name, release, core/thread, base/turbo, cache, TDP
---------------------------------------------------------------
i7-1165G7, TigerLake, 2020Q3, 4/8, 2.8/4.7, 12mb, 28W
N5105, JasperLake, 2021Q1, 4/4, 2.0/2.9, 6.5mb, 10W
J4125, GeminiLake, 2019Q4, 4/4, 2.0/2.7, 4mb?, 10W
N6005, JasperLake, 2021Q1, 4/4, 2.0/3.3, 4mb, 10W
N5095, JasperLake, 2021Q1, 4/4, 2.0/2.9, 4mb, 15W
(search for "Intel" and model name to get the Intel ark page for each)
The N5105 seems the best if you care more about power usage than being
able to host a bunch of other cpu intensive stuff on it. Also has more
capable pci-e, faster ddr4, newer, etc.
The are also some based on this one:
J6413, ElkhartLake, 2021Q1, 4/4, 1.8/3.0, 1.5mb, 10W, LPDDR4 3733
(faster ram but less cache).
Where to buy:
* Aliexpress Topton store https://www.aliexpress.com/store/1101224793
* N5105 4x 2.5Gbit $166, no serial
https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256804153987410.html
* N5105 6x 2.5Gbit $218, has serial
https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256804173890686.html
It's interesting that most of the units are marketed specifically for
pfSense(but often say "soft router" or "network appliance" too).
All seem to be using Intel i-225. Some specs on this product sheet:
https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/639476
Apparently it's important to have the B3 stepping or later of that,
earlier revs had issues, and many of the units on aliexpress explicitly
mention B3. There is an i-226 now too, which some units have. Some
people are speculating that it's just a rebrand of the i-225v B3 since
the i-225 name is tainted now.
Anyone know about the state of the linux driver for this device? Does it
have all the nice things one would want for SQM? Any hardware features
that are nice (or should be turned off)?
I ordered a couple of the 4-port models to experiment with.
(FYI: StH also have some reviews of inexpensive 2.5G unmanaged switches.
some with PoE too, but I haven't looked into them much yet.)
--
Matt Taggart
matt@lackof.org
reply other threads:[~2022-10-22 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b8d2a54-5dcb-ad80-e443-80a9d3ee69ac@lackof.org \
--to=matt@lackof.org \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox