From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F2F13B29E; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:22:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC8438999; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:23:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 475UBiZTMtCo; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:23:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5C838997; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:23:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A5113C5; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:22:27 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: "David P. Reed" cc: "Dave Taht" , Scott Manley , cerowrt-devel , bloat In-Reply-To: <1609543872.082620517@apps.rackspace.com> References: <1609543872.082620517@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 20:22:27 -0500 Message-ID: <473.1609636947@localhost> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] my thx to spacex (and kerbal space program) forcheering me up all year X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 01:22:28 -0000 Well, it was supposed to be "simpler than IPv6", but my take away was really: "we never really understood IPv6"