Re: [Cerowrt-devel] openwrt build for ar71xx (wndr3800, archer, picostation, etc)

[Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>]

Dave,

I see you're on OpenWrt head, but the CC build is staying with uclibc (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.embedded.openwrt.devel/32651)

It would be a tiny step backwards from your most recent build, but it would avoid all the uclibc->musl hassles...

Rich

On Jun 17, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> get at:
> 
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/lupin/ar71xx/
> 
> Not doing versioning...
> 
> my mission is to come up with something *stable* I can deploy across
> several routers more than fiddle with new stuff. Not having snmp is an
> issue...
> 
> + openwrt head
> + built with libmusl for the first time (bunch of tools missing now)
> + this includes the latest changes for sqm-scripts and gui (no direct
> support for cake in the gui), from sebastian from this morning
> + minstrel-blues and andrew mcgregors "minimum variance" patches
> + the latest cake from last night
> + babeld-1.6.1 (with ecn on by default)
> + dnsmasq-2.73
> tested for all of a half hour. NOT tested as a default gw in particular.
> 
> Notes:
> 
> - a really critical thing broke in the musl build - I use snmp a lot.
> Can't deploy without it. Will try to fix.
> 
> - I missed setting the dnssec-timestamp option on by default in
> /etc/config/dhcp correctly in the init file. Not sure what "correct"
> is. (?)
> 
> - cake showed some issues in long rtt testing:
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/latestcake/
> 
> (but I am still having cable modem weirdnesses - am moving to an
> emulated longer rtt environment shortly... after I flash a couple more
> routers)
> 
> - and thus far I have been unable to build anything (uclibc or musl)
> for the linksys ac1900.
> 
> - babel in openwrt head defaults to logging to flash by default which
> I think is a really bad idea for general use... but useful right
> now...
> 
> - I would have thought that with
> 
> config globals 'globals'
>        option ula_prefix 'fd59:c767:7910::/48'
> 
> That the system would have announced a /48 route for that. I am not
> particularly fond of random ula's showing up everywhere, so I tend to
> comment ula_prefix out. It is locally "unreachable" which is correct,
> but babel only exports p2p routes by default... /me puzzles over
> syntax
> 
> - too scared to try hnetd again. Anyone fiddling with it? (I need a
> bunch of interior routers to "just work" at the moment)
> 
> - it defaults to a bridged vlan now. I am unfond of that, but I left
> the vlan on to see if it would break anything...
> 
> + without nat, forwards through pie, cake, fq_codel at 110mbit.
> 
> -- 
> Dave Täht
> worldwide bufferbloat report:
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
> And:
> What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel