From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C90621F1D5 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle.home.lan ([79.229.225.62]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaWlT-1Vpqrt35e3-00mLue for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:53:46 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <742DEEBA-4208-4366-BF60-504C58A9C813@imap.cc> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:53:45 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <48DAC6B8-9C68-484D-9A5B-B11C6E4E36C8@gmx.de> References: <742DEEBA-4208-4366-BF60-504C58A9C813@imap.cc> To: Fred Stratton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:sgHGybbxhCoRTEvvREibrW8GlbQlyBGwp+AU/DpplhmRZP6pgxx hEPkpEpEza4v+5CL77PffsAgFULBt2qQ4aUqcNq8+Bt32nqCDN45UaJx2XDqdHbWDuSbBhW +99Yeq1I+aX9flRrSL/lQXCxI0QTuS5aRrlw1pxZKKIMFDJZSuluDiLoTf47RGj4I/bINdd G+T/Olc++bBe4ZV3J5BZQ== Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] AQM and ADSL X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:53:49 -0000 H Fred On Aug 13, 2013, at 17:28 , Fred Stratton wrote: > I have been experimenting with the two sets of modified sets of = scripts and AQM panels. Thank you for constructing them. Thanks for testing... >=20 > To mention the string ''for ATM choose' is repeated erroneously in the = extended panel. Fixed=85 I will try to test whether it actually works before = sending the next version... >=20 > The scripts work. >=20 > The link layer giving best results is ethernet. What and how did you measure? Using "use HTB's private mechanism = for linklayer and overhead" or "Use tc's stab mechanism for linklayer = and overhead"? A little browsing of the kernel source makes me believe = that the HTB version is fully busted and will not do anything at all (so = I would have imagined adel atm and ethernet to behave the same). I am = thinking about how to test whether a link layer adjustment works or not. > Pinging severs whilst running Netalyzr has no effect. Not being a native english speaker cloud you be more explicit, = please. Was the ping RTT affected by the concurrent netalyzr run = (especially up- and download testing)? Did you get netsurf-wrapper to = work on ubuntu? >=20 > The tone buckets of the phone signal are translated into ATM packets = by the DSP in the 2 Wire 2700. I have no idea what this closed source = BSD implementation does to the packets before they are sent to CeroWRT. >=20 > I am using 3.10.2-1, as I cannot get the latest version to install = with sys upgrade. So 3.10.6-1 fails with sysupgrade? best Sebastian >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel