From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 882B7208AAD for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from hms-beagle-3.home.lan ([217.254.130.56]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lg1QN-1VZnTG0V11-00pdRM for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:54:01 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <4B0976EC-5224-4E81-B5DF-96A85424FB6E@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:54:00 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <49DBDBE7-BF76-4823-B723-670935A55833@gmx.de> References: <4B0976EC-5224-4E81-B5DF-96A85424FB6E@gmail.com> To: Rich Brown X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:W/FNW4ruyiEKQ4gb8O47VFKLlbl9pN+qsjLJOXX/A8EIymJHiUk BbLka6cBjA2Thwd8zfa/1bTCKSHMszwPnzGDkVlKoV+VDVuY/+9RPmDhaB0V9wSCBNjtGgV 1w1B+TBtjx6FElFH0F36SHWH0vazN6OKXnj6TiQ8uT403+tYHjFGWoLWctv8lowHC+3oDoj pCVV12FMtwJ0+3p5WLjrQ== Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] VDSL X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:55:05 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:55:05 -0000 Hi Rich, On Jan 11, 2014, at 17:29 , Rich Brown wrote: > The VDSL option is burning up way too many of my brain cells. Given = that VDSL may well use ATM, while VDSL2 is unlikely to use ATM, I think = that it isn=92t useful to include it as a top-level choice . >=20 > In the new pages, I propose removing the VDSL choice, leaving: >=20 > - =93ATM (any kind of DSL link)=94 and=20 > - =93None=94 Well, that looks like a decent recommendation for the wiki. The = SQM configuration page still needs to expose all three values, atm, = ethernet, and none so that people can actually change things... >=20 > and letting people tune the settings after reading the =93Everything = you wanted to know=85=94 page if they want to optimize.=20 Exactly, we still need options exposed for making this possible. >=20 > = http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Setting_up_AQM_for_CeroWr= t_310 >=20 > -and- >=20 > = http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Everything_you_wanted_to_= know_about_Link_Layer_Adaptation >=20 > Rich Best Regards Sebastian > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel