From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gettysjim@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com (mail-qc0-f171.google.com
	[209.85.216.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CE1F200174
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcsp15 with SMTP id p15so2384821qcs.16
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=q00/H+HIWipFModbmJ6yngJ59ck7ANfwRJ1OxlFkJjo=;
	b=Myj7jCeP5A4s1rGsPT4SdM/bgKWSxlFsEuTRlr7pjS+jR4hVBRdq4ZIwfcLv0rHTm1
	qoym3fSZN9rUI5tb/DbH3TIjUjAHf3ZHsC+DZnZ2cRF9YGMJkICXxC7fsB+cMesOuiWo
	z5pT7gO3Yzp9bnsan4FSv8xHo20eMZ09yIxvNnAMDiqKeXfUo0g1cxG2LavPDFtY7PpG
	Sc92po5sBXXKAtgfRtRYXW+Ctd9/K1ZOX9Zp4RbeyojUZE9C15r9N/CsaosURWFf4uHq
	ETui5zQFcKYnLx+ewncVPKMUWdDZ292hVnI6MOC4fgXSucdgqHM99SAyxIG36Tsvtova
	5+fw==
Received: by 10.224.116.6 with SMTP id k6mr1137612qaq.91.1333041106092;
	Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.144] (c-50-138-169-248.hsd1.ma.comcast.net.
	[50.138.169.248])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ha3sm13373453qab.13.2012.03.29.10.11.44
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Jim Gettys <gettysjim@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F7497CF.5010301@freedesktop.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:11:43 -0400
From: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
Organization: Bell Labs
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] printer problem,  netmask & renumbering....
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:11:47 -0000

My problems with my printers might be related to netmask problems.

We ended up putting the wireless into 192.168.1 this time.

This is a problematic renumbering if the goal is to preserve a
192.168.1.x to be existing, probably hard wired ethernet.

It's probably the case we should only renumber the one network, leaving
the netmask alone, leaving all the wireless network addresses alone.

I'll try a netmask change to see if that makes the printer work before
updating its firmware.

But not for a while; I forgot I had an eye appointment today and trying
to do this while my eyes are recovering from dilation is not my idea of fun.
                    - Jim