From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.spiderweb.com.au (mail.spiderweb.com.au [202.6.248.7]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D833A21F166 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.30.42.68] ([::ffff:101.167.17.51]) (AUTH: PLAIN markc@renta.net, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by mail.spiderweb.com.au with esmtp; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:05:44 +1000 id 0000000000A34006.00000000505B14A8.0000518F Message-ID: <505B14A3.6050302@renta.net> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:05:39 +1000 From: Mark Constable User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120910 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <505AC149.2000905@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] understanding_cerowrt_buildsystem X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:05:48 -0000 On 09/20/12 20:41, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > Also it makes it harder for Dave to delegate building to somebody else > as he hinted last time. Could at least we make a list on the wiki of > most common build problems and questions? Wouldn't it be better to use the issue tracker and pull requests at Github? The whole point of Github is to make is easier for folks to cooperate and accelerate project development and it has excellent tools for doing exactly that, as long as the direction of the project allows for it and takes advantage of the available social facilities. I'd like to get more involved too but it just seems all too hard atm so I build stock AA OpenWrt uml images instead, for now, hoping I can get up to speed with understanding the CeroWrt build process.