From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <edwin+ml-cerowrt@etorok.net>
Received: from mail.etorok.net (mail.etorok.net
	[IPv6:2a01:4f8:160:1223::beef:2])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689B721F15C
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun,  4 Nov 2012 01:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:2f02:1022:712d:1e6f:65ff:fe23:db0d] (unknown
	[IPv6:2a02:2f02:1022:712d:1e6f:65ff:fe23:db0d])
	by mail.etorok.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6FD246A8
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun,  4 Nov 2012 09:35:52 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=etorok.net;
	s=MAILOUT; t=1352018152;
	bh=HgQBi13gwJXVlZFK38hcQEtc2Jqn78sva6zvJZbInn4=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:
	In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=ArfDdz4JwLF50jGVR/+Z1os/S4Peibj0doPXugIeYGUc07BI5ZRRYPwBTfrgmH9D5
	NbDFt3gNSelIcDoU0W+4tPxBLkbuNM7B/uEav7NtWjA7d0YjtBct+O/Cwux5VMLGQB
	ZCyb0ccfJilAMGXRrePYKP+jNzXwq1f9dFk9cx8k=
Message-ID: <509628E7.6090900@etorok.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 10:35:51 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= <edwin+ml-cerowrt@etorok.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:10.0.10) Gecko/20121027 Icedove/10.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <CAA93jw7BemxQNX5ikPai+crHBJtue==sPFNSBLq08TRn4fAbnA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7BemxQNX5ikPai+crHBJtue==sPFNSBLq08TRn4fAbnA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] getting fq_codel tested in the next year (in
 the ubuntu 13.4 test series?) somehow
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 08:35:56 -0000

On 11/04/2012 12:11 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> 
> PPS I'm sort of on a mission now to get BQL support into more
> hardware... particularly arm hardware, which seems to be mostly hooked
> up via the usb bus nowadays, there.
> 

Is it possible to have BQL on r8169?
It had BQL in 3.4, and 3.5 but got dropped in 3.6 due to some issues:
https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=17bcb684f08649a2ab6a7dcd8288332e72d208f1

--Edwin