From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <robert.bradley1@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com
	[74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B08D321F17F
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri,  4 Jan 2013 14:49:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t49so8400474wey.28
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:49:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=l/fuUsOKt1wknXppPxT3oSSrCIUimgqb1zxo6/tcVvQ=;
	b=exuGGWRe2XKL8lQWhb+4hbg0kL1mC5Fj/BdCIC7i7GE4fhh9EYHn/VVvkl/7IenFiL
	FoiKFIKYr3Fnpnj9l9CBfspvwtzETPdDlger0u7JPnpem2+mN8epoxWRcShhKFT/zboL
	6dJtBW6OD0Y83+k/Cr3HhnWlUeHU06N1RUM+k5/87RTxTv/X/jl2NcEWBDBTMoMAr6z3
	yDjaxZnRnMuyouatH5/5ITIVqdyy4an1GdeMVym1rUvOkkJFu/WNFgighuRUmCFNq2Di
	48t9wTfTJXQDA53UjFJ9ha6XXIaGH35q+Y+N7QzjF54fU0d24lIvX0Tyq3MZ5LkFVRk0
	UNSw==
X-Received: by 10.180.88.138 with SMTP id bg10mr75426wib.13.1357339771944;
	Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:6aac:3::2aa7:14c? ([2001:470:6aac:3::2aa7:14c])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bw9sm1065958wib.5.2013.01.04.14.49.31
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50E75C7A.3000606@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:49:30 +0000
From: Robert Bradley <robert.bradley1@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
References: <CAA93jw5zUfm=5jhd3y=Z6jjZ-+1nEcE=f7OuKojBJT+PsUuPuw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANn89i+W19eiH1o5MJjAe2nk-4=STCxQUhbM3XCu3=7FriZepQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw5pLRgM3EmHgHjzMUTYBcbDXzQd_DFJ4OLY5aA2ets8GA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMZR1YBs0w1r9T1S7A-Uin34tGMrY3y7oh0WqiZZ-SaXTeQMNA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMZR1YAuZRYktGedS+DRymNVnEqOAu_QLVAAuOLaxGn_5ByfzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1357333261.187724652@apps.rackspace.com>
In-Reply-To: <1357333261.187724652@apps.rackspace.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] TFO crashes cerowrt 3.7.1-1
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:49:34 -0000

On 04/01/13 21:01, dpreed@reed.com wrote:
> Is this a TFO where the endpoint is on cerowrt, or just a SYN+DATA for a non cerowrt destination?
>   
> I was looking at the firewall rules, and they are pretty complicated.  Perhaps the SYN+DATA triggers a strange firewall behavior (a loop?)   SYN's are special to firewalls, as we know.
>

I'm wondering if it could be an issue with the NAT or 
connection-tracking code somehow not coping with the TFO options.

-- 
Robert Bradley