Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
To: cerowrt developers <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] administrative questions
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:28:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <510A9BA2.1080500@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD6NSj5jMt0Wuw_rv_9EYmLbpQT40XT88OJEfwtqks4ecCZa8w@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/30/13 10:03 PM, Ketan Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:19 PM, William Allen Simpson
> <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 1/29/13 11:24 PM, Ketan Kulkarni wrote:
>>> You can submit the patches to this list, ccing Dave, or you can attach
>>> it to the reported bugs for better future tracking.
>>> All standard linux formatting applies here as well.
>>>
>> OK.  I have various TCP, TCPCT (RFC 6013) and RFC1323bis patches from
>> several years ago.  I'm slowly updating my patches from 2.6.33 and .37
>> to 3.7.4, but pretty much nothing is patching cleanly -- so it's going
>> to be a long hard slog.
>>
> Yes there was a discussion about TCPCT recently on this list.
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/2013-January/000887.html

Aha, just the kinda thing that I was looking for....

> ...
> Though I personally haven't looked at the security aspect of TFO, it
> would be good to have wider views on the same. At the same time around
> Dave pointed me to TCPCT RFC.
>
I've actually got a preliminary "TFO Considered Harmful" written, but
was waiting for their RFC to be published.

Gettys had invited me here (from TCPM WG) some time ago, and I actually
bought a pair of WNDR3800 last February specifically to run CeroWRT.
But then the release seemed very unstable at the time, and I stuck with
the Netgear code and gave one to a brother.

I am now running sugarland.  I'll start submitting proposed patches
(tested on a spare linux box, not risking my access to the net) via
the Issues.  I'm patching against .../stable/linux-stable.git, but it
compiles as 2.8.0-rc3+ -- is that what CeroWRT is/will be using?

I was looking for a .git repository and compile instructions, but
didn't find anything under Documents or Files.



  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-31 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-29 18:42 William Allen Simpson
2013-01-30  4:24 ` Ketan Kulkarni
2013-01-30 16:49   ` William Allen Simpson
2013-01-31  3:03     ` Ketan Kulkarni
2013-01-31 16:28       ` William Allen Simpson [this message]
2013-01-31 17:43       ` William Allen Simpson
2013-02-01 15:51         ` Ketan Kulkarni
2013-02-04  6:06           ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=510A9BA2.1080500@gmail.com \
    --to=william.allen.simpson@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox