From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f49.google.com (mail-vb0-f49.google.com [209.85.212.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16AE1208ABD for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:28:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id s24so1857331vbi.36 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:28:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vpw7dTG9Ia1gsY67w7eFHLMd4vJBeW70R8s0re1oT0Q=; b=drCUw7HzCIqtJKvpAawu1l4on9REoPfzhDCNotf0n4xWBBJI/qBFgPIHvGo1froq0c WafYkKATrbqVLKjdRi73a5f3YsSj8MhGkOxXdoQnLKlHwHrkpnpy/mr+ET3PPw7AodKf l5aZPIY4mKq5fWpMhYXAomPRG+R9q48EbwAJl8JeR0TvEjBQT7Qs7x7wXC46t6QxMBgy StqUqlidn+19QBfEmLeonhZY+tWu9m+zV22TLfzOciNzMbHB0iM8g8QVixZIC9dEsVYK Bh+ooyHzaTqp6Au2IuZ6vWvSDaGxOloakkMweFJd/rYphAEIJmJuXwaHaY/SWKSHGdhy i6Jg== X-Received: by 10.58.145.106 with SMTP id st10mr4367168veb.39.1359649701774; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from wastrel.home.lan (d192-24-251-5.try.wideopenwest.com. [24.192.5.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x17sm5131641vdi.1.2013.01.31.08.28.19 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:28:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510A9BA2.1080500@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:28:18 -0500 From: William Allen Simpson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt developers References: <5108180E.4030602@gmail.com> <51094F04.7010602@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] administrative questions X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:28:23 -0000 On 1/30/13 10:03 PM, Ketan Kulkarni wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:19 PM, William Allen Simpson > wrote: >> On 1/29/13 11:24 PM, Ketan Kulkarni wrote: >>> You can submit the patches to this list, ccing Dave, or you can attach >>> it to the reported bugs for better future tracking. >>> All standard linux formatting applies here as well. >>> >> OK. I have various TCP, TCPCT (RFC 6013) and RFC1323bis patches from >> several years ago. I'm slowly updating my patches from 2.6.33 and .37 >> to 3.7.4, but pretty much nothing is patching cleanly -- so it's going >> to be a long hard slog. >> > Yes there was a discussion about TCPCT recently on this list. > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/2013-January/000887.html Aha, just the kinda thing that I was looking for.... > ... > Though I personally haven't looked at the security aspect of TFO, it > would be good to have wider views on the same. At the same time around > Dave pointed me to TCPCT RFC. > I've actually got a preliminary "TFO Considered Harmful" written, but was waiting for their RFC to be published. Gettys had invited me here (from TCPM WG) some time ago, and I actually bought a pair of WNDR3800 last February specifically to run CeroWRT. But then the release seemed very unstable at the time, and I stuck with the Netgear code and gave one to a brother. I am now running sugarland. I'll start submitting proposed patches (tested on a spare linux box, not risking my access to the net) via the Issues. I'm patching against .../stable/linux-stable.git, but it compiles as 2.8.0-rc3+ -- is that what CeroWRT is/will be using? I was looking for a .git repository and compile instructions, but didn't find anything under Documents or Files.