From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com (mail-qe0-f53.google.com [209.85.128.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B391521F107 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i11so1122672qej.26 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:06:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3DbF7DXewunXL3gAtHy6AiP3oX8vpqJZdDcVGHQvVOw=; b=T2t8vKnaezLoJs4zCMC3xBdsMcNhCKMb5+yMZzHj41syXQnWD/QohgGXpJFjqlvlzY 5BC2XKImWzdnBmkwE/v6tBb+ZbRC/LXzeLx+qENDpLL3s8cuepR50At2NQZmVytyhGqO Y3J/Us/rvT4fg56C/IilrgDl1ClhQhv7JfALI8doCQJ6unJ9P+jXB0ER1Yv7GGweDJw4 Zb2udxUD3NeKtnwHG5P6ezgVaxqBL+Aq5g+dBMIqP8wDzSILI1YnaRfRcJY1qmuystB4 CoLh1LjHsyfMzgp7wM48YeeHJPzgDGAoEC4KEj/hDpNIc5l54dk8S3vc2U6Xs2RbJnoJ f+zw== X-Received: by 10.224.184.143 with SMTP id ck15mr21736382qab.15.1366805197262; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:4830:1600:423::2? (cl-1060.qas-01.us.sixxs.net. [2001:4830:1600:423::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bv6sm4330963qab.5.2013.04.24.05.06.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5177CACB.8050505@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:06:35 -0400 From: William Katsak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130419 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <98D3C55B-9D34-495C-AA82-CEDEE1882448@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Multicast X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:06:39 -0000 It seems that a lot of people are interested in IGMP proxying in order to watch multicast IPTV streams from their ISP. In my case, I am using the router to run two subnets, one for actual stuff, another for non-trusted people to use the Internet. I would like to be able to do Ghost imaging (Ghost is running in the primary subnet) of the machines in the non-trusted subnet, but it seems that the multicast traffic isn't going through properly. I CAN do this within the primary subnet. I got igmpproxy running and can see the route announcements in the log, but I assume I have it mis-configured. Maybe I will go back to pimd and play with that. I guess if all else fails, I can always switch the VLAN of the port that serves that segment when I want to do imagine and switch it back later :) ... I just thought this might be a good opportunity to try and see if I can get multicast to run properly. Thanks, Bill P.S. This router is still running Sugarland...should that be an issue? On 04/24/2013 05:30 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Dave Taht wrote: >> >>> pimd is included by default. >> >> But does pimd really do IGMP-proxying? > No, it does real IGMP. :) > > There may be some firewall issues with it. > >> I can't find any mention of IGMP >> proxying in the pimd manual I found. ISPs generally do not allow residential >> customers to talk PIM with the network, they expect an IGMP join, which is >> what an IGMP proxy would do. > Sample application? >> -- >> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > >