From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E22200666 for ; Sun, 5 May 2013 10:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m6so1901818wiv.15 for ; Sun, 05 May 2013 10:01:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MX4nXhZIeXIJCqIJbAl9TygcOfWfs0OzjG+OHtg6ZqM=; b=i2mSalM8Z6FeRt1Z6JG7Cs3Jm6Y/mxfOhmrSPeRabR5nakLwZZLwdYlVHpisEhovkS Imh2uVa1EOfKvOEvGtFjM+ojds5Tca650bJuZCQjqN1Df4g9Q3XE5F2AjDeJQUA/Tsuh tZ8jOQ8LT4irU2V9E2IZkgtJ+SQBzZzOCm7s0qAkAWWMutK56rBJQI28f6DNpYCDlxOp YGf+wL2vQhasqeDf00rWagyC7+cOEseDO0V1FajZ+JqTV0f2graeB0xsxdasw73Hpo4U VTpCX5fMGdi0OtPDTAj9B1ni5SY968T8AGBnStIqyK8w+GGpDOb46HqsLK/GCgsYUT0f MEmQ== X-Received: by 10.180.77.12 with SMTP id o12mr5345170wiw.0.1367773265077; Sun, 05 May 2013 10:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:6aac:3::783c:88e8? ([2001:470:6aac:3::783c:88e8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m13sm2527024wiw.7.2013.05.05.10.01.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 05 May 2013 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5186904F.60403@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 18:01:03 +0100 From: Robert Bradley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht References: <5177DDA8.8010801@gmail.com> <51794652.4030906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] atomic route updates? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 17:01:07 -0000 On 05/05/13 13:02, Dave Taht wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Robert Bradley > wrote: >> I was seeing that bug on the quantal 3.5 kernel as well. So far, testing >> with the raring 3.8 kernel seems to fix both the unreachable route bug and >> the random /128 route bugs. My patched babeld also appears to work no worse >> than the distro-provided 1.3.1 build. That said, with both versions I see >> that babeld switches to wireless routes and stays there if eth0 is >> disconnected and later restored. > Still stuck on this? I'm planning a new build this week with your > atomic route stuff in it. babel 1.3.6 and 1.40 have been released. > The current code is behaving identically to the upstream master branch to me, so I think this is fine for the new build. -- Robert Bradley