From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from chi.subsignal.org (cxd-2-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:ed::2]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90E321F1A8 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 02:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (unknown [212.255.44.191]) by chi.subsignal.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FB57126016; Wed, 8 May 2013 11:22:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <518A18FA.4030600@openwrt.org> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 11:20:58 +0200 From: Steven Barth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130112 Icedove/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: homenet@ietf.org, Markus Stenberg , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [homenet] pushing the bird faster X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 09:21:00 -0000 On 08.05.2013 11:07, Dave Taht wrote: > Unless you wish to maintain these modifications forever, it is helpful > to seek consensus with the mainline developers of these tools to push > your patches in a mutually acceptible form. I would suspect that dnsmasq > and odhcp6c devs would be amiable to a discussion at the very least. Speaking for odhcp6c I have looked into the homenet changes yesterday and I don't see it as a big hassle to merge these features into the main branch at some point once they have an official IANA number and the specs are somewhat stable. Also feel free to contact me if you are thinking about getting anything IPv6-related upstream to OpenWrt and we can discuss that or you can of course also use the official channels, mailing lists and so on.