From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from chi.subsignal.org (cxd-2-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:ed::2]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DD221F1A8 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 02:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (unknown [212.255.44.191]) by chi.subsignal.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94B90126016; Wed, 8 May 2013 11:33:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <518A1BA7.8000406@openwrt.org> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 11:32:23 +0200 From: Steven Barth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130112 Icedove/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Markus Stenberg References: <518A18FA.4030600@openwrt.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: homenet@ietf.org, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [homenet] pushing the bird faster X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 09:32:25 -0000 On 08.05.2013 11:27, Markus Stenberg wrote: > > That's underlying problem with both dnsmasq and odhcp6c forked changes - we use IOS-specific prefix class option # that is NOT from IANA, and I'd rather not see it in wide use for obvious reasons. > > And as a general point on odhcp6c front, I think a better method of expressing 'extra prefix-specificoptions' should be found than just adding more entries to the CSV list of ENV_PREFIXES. In my experience, long lists of CSV-style entries become rather awkward to handle if you want to be futureproof; key=value within (or something else) is much better. Yes, I agree. Feel free to do that for the prefix class. I guess I will eventually do that for the prefix exclusion feature as well.