From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71E117636ED;
	Thu,  2 Jul 2015 20:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagh6 with SMTP id h6so72569481lag.2;
	Thu, 02 Jul 2015 20:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=zEJT+RFWB7m5kN42nbYpsBB0F/3xKQWXXHJcEAR+7WY=;
	b=aqX0VLtjq3rLH4Lx5DyHc53HXvjJ0LehS8D7r6RAAFvLdF1E8qRkn4WOIKCJ4h7Rjs
	TeKVZ94kraXX3G4roRJQfWEmBHQ9qxkKOsc7pxy07nn04xAtUj8oA/YXcvkOLVwPLok7
	0t5lQ0f7pqwkCcc/+P37EVlx8nEpF8T+UtMMmPC1Z9Q4qzX3dMN93cySDYpTFfA+u3JJ
	1Cnef2iMqwwyhEn0MspSutDYLgzOinA8LzlhEc/pD0mkNRulcmbSqHQ33fNLQxTgNFSP
	XlrWz2WWRovd6ylxFb/T+1Upz08xcttbhmHTDR/2RB0XbUYjCdl88eyHsgM9dIW/XR92
	TTcg==
X-Received: by 10.152.27.74 with SMTP id r10mr34220337lag.31.1435893316361;
	Thu, 02 Jul 2015 20:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (188-67-140-175.bb.dnainternet.fi.
	[188.67.140.175])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j6sm1945823laj.13.2015.07.02.20.15.14
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 02 Jul 2015 20:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4D9Z6-RqNPzgo1eUdW6_natr_Wj+oXCALetPGdzf75-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:15:11 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <519B9F74-17B7-407D-9DAD-E5A0C610108D@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw4D9Z6-RqNPzgo1eUdW6_natr_Wj+oXCALetPGdzf75-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] peeling harder with cake
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 03:15:49 -0000


> On 3 Jul, 2015, at 04:27, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Also got more throughput for some reason.

Is the NIC doing software GSO or does it have hardware support?  If the =
former, it would suggest that software GSO is a universally bad idea and =
should be excised.  If the latter, GSO should be disabled full stop for =
this hardware, so we can stop fannying about with peeling.

 - Jonathan Morton