From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-x236.google.com (mail-ea0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C7D21F1A1 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d10so5954903eaj.13 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:46:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C6YtRoYfkVFOpwAVaVVncamLF5DdEfPKSC9ODsmBwg8=; b=Bmaw3AiAN6I9TECuc+3nnO4C3Ulp7CyGKtcrtuGTl+Zz2ANcPYfnYmCALvo/BX2Ft2 hRxZ2HgzDLReFsd5R3dmVvOEscx7bcUEnGISPgKI3QCz7dU7lxqVnBA4cIMEZbc7hTvk o+wXmM+AIXGbsITIbltKX11Oo5RJeF18jld6y1w9UEt1HOyxZ9V6gLvX4JzE+Wk0WwEd LOz7vLiAocvjUKNPh61G6bIyvLe2U4GoENLN70I2bzUhe0q/KR9X62rIEOy676R8G21M J4PgcKYjRSkyeg8uhwrBXsrNUSb+xOnsWZnaCPc4VcL2sEBoOhqFwHrbH+z5EO8hX9+h WfQQ== X-Received: by 10.14.179.133 with SMTP id h5mr3198013eem.46.1373571983291; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:6aac:3:e437:dc65:e797:966c? ([2001:470:6aac:3:e437:dc65:e797:966c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bj46sm71653970eeb.13.2013.07.11.12.46.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51DF0B8B.3050000@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:46:19 +0100 From: Robert Bradley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <51DEE063.5040307@laptop.org> <51DEEC00.801@laptop.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Turning off the probe blocker X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:46:25 -0000 On 11/07/13 19:41, Dave Taht wrote: > Nice stats for an oft-loaded fq_codel based wifi mesh network with not > a lot of fixes (besides disabling 802.11e at key points so far)! > > I have seen much, much, much, worse from most other meshes. I noticed yesterday that disabling WMM/802.11e in CeroWRT limited me to 54 Mb/s. The reduced rates are probably not an issue for the mesh network, especially with 11g nodes present. Would it be better though to force the traffic into one queue (BE, presumably) and keep the higher data rates? -- Robert Bradley